Okes Nicola C, Hockey Philip A R, Cumming Graeme S
DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
Conserv Biol. 2008 Feb;22(1):151-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00862.x.
In theory the consideration of life-history characteristics should provide a way of making predictive generalizations about the responses of different species to environmental modification. Nevertheless, few studies have tested the validity of this assumption or attempted to apply it across large numbers of related species. We explored both quantitative and qualitative contrasts between species of waterbirds that have either expanded or contracted their ranges in southern Africa over the past 40 years to test the hypothesis that expansionists and contractionists, respectively, should share life-history characteristics and/or ecological attributes. Similarities and differences in life history and ecology were explored through multivariate statistics. Overall, life-history traits provided an inadequate explanation of whether species would be range expansionists or contractionists. By contrast, ecological attributes of species that related to habitat use correlated well with range changes. In particular, waterbird species that inhabit pans seemed to be preadapted to using human-made dams and impoundments. The ability of many species to use artificial wetlands has aided their westward range expansions into arid regions of southern Africa. By contrast, species that rely on vegetated wetlands and that require reeds for nesting were predisposed to range contraction because their habitats have been severely affected by agricultural development and urbanization. In direct contrast to range expansions, most range contractions were west to east, the eastward contraction reflected the high level of wetland loss and degradation in the eastern lowlands of South Africa. Based on analysis of ecological attributes of regional contractionists, several additional species were identified as of potential conservation concern, although such concern may not as yet have been expressed.
从理论上讲,对生活史特征的考量应该能提供一种方法,对不同物种对环境变化的反应做出预测性的概括。然而,很少有研究检验这一假设的有效性,也很少有研究尝试将其应用于大量相关物种。我们探讨了在过去40年里在南部非洲分布范围扩大或缩小的水鸟物种之间的定量和定性差异,以检验以下假设:分布范围扩大的物种和缩小的物种分别应具有共同的生活史特征和/或生态属性。通过多变量统计方法探究了生活史和生态方面的异同。总体而言,生活史特征并不能充分解释一个物种会成为分布范围扩大者还是缩小者。相比之下,与栖息地利用相关的物种生态属性与分布范围变化密切相关。特别是,栖息在季节性水塘的水鸟物种似乎预先适应了利用人工水坝和蓄水池。许多物种利用人工湿地的能力帮助它们向西扩展到南部非洲的干旱地区。相比之下,依赖植被湿地且筑巢需要芦苇的物种则倾向于分布范围缩小,因为它们的栖息地受到了农业发展和城市化的严重影响。与分布范围扩大形成直接对比的是,大多数分布范围缩小是从西向东,向东的缩小反映了南非东部低地湿地丧失和退化的严重程度。基于对区域分布范围缩小者生态属性的分析,又确定了几个具有潜在保护价值的物种,尽管这种价值可能尚未得到体现。