McKenna David A, Coakley Fergus V, Westphalen Antonio C, Zhao Shoujun, Lu Ying, Webb Emily M, Pickett Barby, Roach Mack, Kurhanewicz John
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, M-372, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.
Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):141-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471061982. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
To retrospectively determine if pretreatment endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings are predictive of outcome in patients who undergo external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Committee on Human Research approval, with waiver of the requirement for informed consent, was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty men with biopsy-proved prostate cancer (mean age, 59 years; range, 47-75 years) who underwent endorectal MR imaging of the prostate prior to external-beam radiation therapy were retrospectively identified; details of baseline tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcome were recorded. Two experienced readers independently reviewed all MR imaging studies and recorded tumor T stage and the radial diameter of extracapsular extension (if present). Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the relationship between baseline imaging and clinical predictive variables and the end point of metastatic failure.
At MR imaging, readers 1 and 2, respectively, considered 50 and 60 patients to have T1 or T2 disease (ie, organ-confined disease) and 30 and 20 patients to have T3 disease. After a mean follow-up of 43 months, four patients developed metastases. Univariate Cox analysis revealed that baseline serum prostate-specific antigen level, presence of extracapsular extension at MR imaging (according to either reader), and degree of extracapsular extension (according to either reader) were all significantly (P < .05) related to the development of metastases. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the sole independent predictive variable was mean diameter of extracapsular extension (relative hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.22, 3.48; P = .007). In particular, three of five patients with extracapsular extension of more than 5 mm at pretreatment MR imaging developed metastases 24, 43, and 63 months after therapy.
The presence and degree of extracapsular extension at MR imaging prior to external-beam radiation therapy are important predictors of posttreatment metastatic recurrence.
回顾性确定治疗前直肠内磁共振(MR)成像结果是否可预测接受前列腺癌外照射放疗患者的预后。
本符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的研究获得了人类研究委员会的批准,并豁免了知情同意的要求。回顾性纳入80例经活检证实为前列腺癌的男性患者(平均年龄59岁;范围47 - 75岁),这些患者在接受外照射放疗前接受了前列腺直肠内MR成像检查;记录了基线肿瘤特征、治疗及预后的详细信息。两位经验丰富的阅片者独立复查所有MR成像研究,并记录肿瘤T分期及包膜外侵犯的径向直径(若存在)。采用单因素和多因素逐步Cox回归分析来研究基线成像和临床预测变量与转移失败终点之间的关系。
在MR成像中,阅片者1和阅片者2分别认为50例和60例患者为T1或T2期疾病(即器官局限性疾病),30例和20例患者为T3期疾病。平均随访43个月后,4例患者发生转移。单因素Cox分析显示,基线血清前列腺特异性抗原水平、MR成像时包膜外侵犯的存在(根据任一阅片者)以及包膜外侵犯程度(根据任一阅片者)均与转移的发生显著相关(P <.05)。多因素Cox分析显示,唯一的独立预测变量是包膜外侵犯的平均直径(相对风险比,2.06;95%置信区间:1.22,3.48;P =.007)。特别是,在治疗前MR成像中包膜外侵犯超过5 mm的5例患者中有3例在治疗后24、43和63个月发生转移。
外照射放疗前MR成像中包膜外侵犯的存在和程度是治疗后转移复发的重要预测因素。