Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌:对于选择主动监测的患者,直肠内磁共振成像和磁共振波谱成像显示的隐匿性肿瘤是否是预后良好的表现?

Prostate cancer: is inapparent tumor at endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging a favorable prognostic finding in patients who select active surveillance?

作者信息

Cabrera Alvin R, Coakley Fergus V, Westphalen Antonio C, Lu Ying, Zhao Shoujun, Shinohara Katsuto, Carroll Peter R, Kurhanewicz John

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):444-50. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472070770.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine whether inapparent tumor at endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging is a favorable prognostic finding in prostate cancer patients who select active surveillance for management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Committee on Human Research approval was obtained and compliance with HIPAA regulations was observed, with waiver of requirement for written consent. Ninety-two men (mean age, 64 years; range, 43-85 years) were retrospectively identified who had biopsy-proved prostate cancer, who had undergone baseline endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging, and who had selected active surveillance for management. Their mean baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 5.5 ng/mL, and the median Gleason score was 6. Two readers with 10 and 3 years of experience independently reviewed all MR images and determined whether tumor was apparent on the basis of evaluation of established morphologic and metabolic findings. Another investigator compiled data about baseline clinical stage, biopsy findings, and serum PSA measurements. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between the clinical parameters and tumor apparency at MR imaging and the biochemical outcome.

RESULTS

At baseline MR imaging, readers 1 and 2 considered 54 and 26 patients, respectively, to have inapparent tumor (fair interobserver agreement; kappa = 0.30). During a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 52 patients had a stable PSA level and 40 had an increasing PSA level. In multivariate analysis, no significant association was found between the baseline clinical stage, Gleason score, serum PSA level, or the presence of apparent tumor at endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging for either reader and the biochemical outcome (P > .05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging findings of tumor apparency or inapparency in prostate cancer patients who select active surveillance for management do not appear to be of prognostic value.

摘要

目的

回顾性确定在选择主动监测管理的前列腺癌患者中,直肠内磁共振成像(MR)和磁共振波谱成像显示的隐匿性肿瘤是否为良好的预后指标。

材料与方法

获得了人类研究委员会的批准,并遵守了健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的规定,无需书面同意。回顾性确定了92名男性(平均年龄64岁;范围43 - 85岁),他们经活检证实患有前列腺癌,接受了基线直肠内MR成像和磁共振波谱成像,并选择了主动监测管理。他们的平均基线血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平为5.5 ng/mL,Gleason评分中位数为6分。两名分别有10年和3年经验的阅片者独立审查了所有MR图像,并根据既定的形态学和代谢结果评估确定肿瘤是否明显。另一名研究人员收集了关于基线临床分期、活检结果和血清PSA测量的数据。采用多因素逻辑回归分析来研究临床参数与MR成像时肿瘤的明显程度以及生化结果之间的关系。

结果

在基线MR成像时,阅片者1和阅片者2分别认为54例和26例患者存在隐匿性肿瘤(观察者间一致性尚可;kappa = 0.30)。在平均4.8年的随访期间,52例患者的PSA水平稳定,40例患者的PSA水平升高。在多因素分析中,对于任何一位阅片者,基线临床分期、Gleason评分、血清PSA水平或直肠内MR成像和磁共振波谱成像显示的明显肿瘤与生化结果之间均未发现显著关联(所有P值均>0.05)。

结论

在选择主动监测管理的前列腺癌患者中,直肠内MR成像和磁共振波谱成像显示的肿瘤明显或隐匿情况似乎没有预后价值。

相似文献

3
Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension.
Radiology. 2004 Jul;232(1):133-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2321031086. Epub 2004 May 27.
5
Prostate cancer: role of pretreatment MR in predicting outcome after external-beam radiation therapy--initial experience.
Radiology. 2008 Apr;247(1):141-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471061982. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
6

引用本文的文献

1
The significance of the visible tumor on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in localized prostate cancer.
Prostate Int. 2021 Mar;9(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Image-based monitoring of targeted biopsy-proven prostate cancer on active surveillance: 11-year experience.
World J Urol. 2016 Feb;34(2):221-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1619-z. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
5
Performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of clinically low-risk prostate cancer.
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):39.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
6
Can high-spatial resolution T2-weighted endorectal MRI rule out clinically significant prostate cancer?
World J Urol. 2014 Apr;32(2):379-83. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1106-3. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
7
MRI of localized prostate cancer: coming of age in the PSA era.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):34-45. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.4478-11.1. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
10
MRI for men undergoing active surveillance or with rising PSA and negative biopsies.
Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Oct;7(10):543-51. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.143.

本文引用的文献

2
Is a digital rectal examination necessary in the diagnosis and clinical staging of early prostate cancer?
BJU Int. 2005 May;95(7):969-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05449.x.
3
Early outcomes of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2005 May;95(7):956-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05446.x.
8
Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer.
Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.036.
10
Watchful waiting and factors predictive of secondary treatment of localized prostate cancer.
J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1111-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000113300.74132.8b.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验