Cabrera Alvin R, Coakley Fergus V, Westphalen Antonio C, Lu Ying, Zhao Shoujun, Shinohara Katsuto, Carroll Peter R, Kurhanewicz John
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.
Radiology. 2008 May;247(2):444-50. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472070770.
To retrospectively determine whether inapparent tumor at endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging is a favorable prognostic finding in prostate cancer patients who select active surveillance for management.
Committee on Human Research approval was obtained and compliance with HIPAA regulations was observed, with waiver of requirement for written consent. Ninety-two men (mean age, 64 years; range, 43-85 years) were retrospectively identified who had biopsy-proved prostate cancer, who had undergone baseline endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging, and who had selected active surveillance for management. Their mean baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 5.5 ng/mL, and the median Gleason score was 6. Two readers with 10 and 3 years of experience independently reviewed all MR images and determined whether tumor was apparent on the basis of evaluation of established morphologic and metabolic findings. Another investigator compiled data about baseline clinical stage, biopsy findings, and serum PSA measurements. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between the clinical parameters and tumor apparency at MR imaging and the biochemical outcome.
At baseline MR imaging, readers 1 and 2 considered 54 and 26 patients, respectively, to have inapparent tumor (fair interobserver agreement; kappa = 0.30). During a mean follow-up of 4.8 years, 52 patients had a stable PSA level and 40 had an increasing PSA level. In multivariate analysis, no significant association was found between the baseline clinical stage, Gleason score, serum PSA level, or the presence of apparent tumor at endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging for either reader and the biochemical outcome (P > .05 for all).
Endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging findings of tumor apparency or inapparency in prostate cancer patients who select active surveillance for management do not appear to be of prognostic value.
回顾性确定在选择主动监测管理的前列腺癌患者中,直肠内磁共振成像(MR)和磁共振波谱成像显示的隐匿性肿瘤是否为良好的预后指标。
获得了人类研究委员会的批准,并遵守了健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的规定,无需书面同意。回顾性确定了92名男性(平均年龄64岁;范围43 - 85岁),他们经活检证实患有前列腺癌,接受了基线直肠内MR成像和磁共振波谱成像,并选择了主动监测管理。他们的平均基线血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平为5.5 ng/mL,Gleason评分中位数为6分。两名分别有10年和3年经验的阅片者独立审查了所有MR图像,并根据既定的形态学和代谢结果评估确定肿瘤是否明显。另一名研究人员收集了关于基线临床分期、活检结果和血清PSA测量的数据。采用多因素逻辑回归分析来研究临床参数与MR成像时肿瘤的明显程度以及生化结果之间的关系。
在基线MR成像时,阅片者1和阅片者2分别认为54例和26例患者存在隐匿性肿瘤(观察者间一致性尚可;kappa = 0.30)。在平均4.8年的随访期间,52例患者的PSA水平稳定,40例患者的PSA水平升高。在多因素分析中,对于任何一位阅片者,基线临床分期、Gleason评分、血清PSA水平或直肠内MR成像和磁共振波谱成像显示的明显肿瘤与生化结果之间均未发现显著关联(所有P值均>0.05)。
在选择主动监测管理的前列腺癌患者中,直肠内MR成像和磁共振波谱成像显示的肿瘤明显或隐匿情况似乎没有预后价值。