Pascual-Figal Domingo A, Domingo Maite, Casas Teresa, Gich Ignasi, Ordoñez-Llanos Jordi, Martínez Pedro, Cinca Juan, Valdés Mariano, Januzzi James L, Bayes-Genis Antoni
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena s/n, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Eur Heart J. 2008 Apr;29(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn023. Epub 2008 Feb 9.
To study the relative prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) monitoring in addition to clinical disease severity scores (CDSSs) in outpatients with destabilized heart failure (HF).
Seventy-one outpatients with recently destabilized HF were recruited. At baseline, and at all following visits, a CDSS based on Framingham criteria was obtained, and NT-proBNP levels were measured in a blind fashion. CDSS did not correlate with NT-proBNP levels at any time (P > 0.1), although their relative changes correlated during follow-up (P < 0.001). Forty patients (56%) had clinical events (cardiovascular death and/or HF hospitalization) within 1 year of follow-up. Changes in CDSS from baseline were not predictive of subsequent events (P > 0.1 for all visits), whereas changes in NT-proBNP levels were predictive at several time points: week 2 (P = 0.005), week 3 (P = 0.037), week 4 (P = 0.015), and 6 months (P = 0.026). A change in NT-proBNP levels at follow-up week 2 (%) added independent prognostic information (P < 0.001, HR 0.982, 95% CI 0.972-0.992) to baseline CDSS (P = 0.002, HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.290-3.266), age (P = 0.007, HR 1.034, 95% CI 1.009-1.059), and left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.013, HR 0.942, 95% CI 0.898-0.987).
Serial monitoring for per cent change in NT-proBNP concentrations offers superior prognostic information to clinical assessment among outpatients with recent destabilized HF.
研究除临床疾病严重程度评分(CDSS)外,N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)监测对失代偿性心力衰竭(HF)门诊患者的相对预后价值。
招募71例近期失代偿性HF门诊患者。在基线及随后的每次随访时,获取基于弗雷明汉标准的CDSS,并以盲法测量NT-proBNP水平。CDSS在任何时候均与NT-proBNP水平无相关性(P>0.1),尽管其相对变化在随访期间具有相关性(P<0.001)。40例患者(56%)在随访1年内发生临床事件(心血管死亡和/或HF住院)。CDSS相对于基线的变化不能预测随后的事件(所有随访时P>0.1),而NT-proBNP水平的变化在几个时间点具有预测性:第2周(P = 0.005)、第3周(P = 0.037)、第4周(P = 0.015)和6个月(P = 0.026)。随访第2周时NT-proBNP水平的变化(%)为基线CDSS(P = 0.002,HR 2.05,95%CI 1.290 - 3.266)、年龄(P = 0.007,HR 1.034,95%CI 1.009 - 1.059)和左心室射血分数(P = 0.013,HR 0.942,95%CI 0.898 - 0.987)增加了独立的预后信息(P<0.001,HR 0.982,95%CI 0.972 - 0.992)。
对于近期失代偿性HF门诊患者,连续监测NT-proBNP浓度的百分比变化比临床评估提供了更优的预后信息。