Earle David B, Mark Lisa A
Department of Surgery, Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA 01199, USA.
Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Feb;88(1):179-201, x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.11.002.
With numerous prosthetic options and a changing landscape of prosthetic development, a systematic approach to choosing a prosthetic is more sensible than trying to memorize all the details of each prosthetic. The surgeon should hone a single technique for the vast majority of inguinal hernia repairs to maximize proficiency. This limits the number of prosthetics to those suitable for that technique. Narrowing the choice further should be based on the likelihood that a given prosthetic will achieve the preoperative goals of the hernia repair. For alternative clinical scenarios, the surgeon should know one to two additional techniques, which may require a different prosthetic. The surgeon should use existing experimental and clinical data to estimate long-term benefits of any new prosthetic.
鉴于有众多的假体选择以及不断变化的假体发展形势,采用系统的方法来选择假体比试图记住每种假体的所有细节更为明智。对于绝大多数腹股沟疝修补术,外科医生应熟练掌握单一技术以实现最高的熟练度。这将假体的选择范围限制在适合该技术的那些假体上。进一步缩小选择范围应基于特定假体实现疝修补术前目标的可能性。对于其他临床情况,外科医生应了解一到两种额外的技术,这可能需要不同的假体。外科医生应利用现有的实验和临床数据来评估任何新假体的长期益处。