Ades P A, Savage P D, Toth M J, Schneider D J, Audelin M C, Bunn J Y, Ludlow M
Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT 05403, USA.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jun;32(6):967-74. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.6. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
Obesity promotes the development and progression of coronary heart disease (CHD), in part, through its association with hyperlipidemia, hypertension, clotting abnormalities and insulin resistance. We assessed whether these relationships persist in patients with established CHD treated with evidence-based preventive pharmacologic therapies.
We performed a cross-sectional study of 74 adults with CHD and a body mass index (BMI) of >27 kg m(-2) (mean 32+/-4). The mean age of subjects was 64+/-9 years (range 44-84 years).
Obesity measures included weight, BMI, waist, fat mass, intra-abdominal fat and subcutaneous fat. Risk factor measures included insulin sensitivity, fasting insulin level, lipid profiles, blood pressure, C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and platelet reactivity. Medication use included aspirin (99%), statin (84%), beta-blocker (71%), ACE inhibitor or blocker (37%) and clopidogrel (28%).
There was no direct relationship between obesity parameters and risk factor measures of lipid concentrations, blood pressure, clotting abnormalities or platelet reactivity except for a modest relationship between visceral fat and hs-CRP (r=0.30, P=0.02). However, increased BMI, waist circumference, fat mass, total abdominal fat and abdominal subcutaneous fat all correlated with insulin sensitivity (r-values -0.30 to -0.45, P-values 0.01 to <0.001) and insulin concentrations. Insulin sensitivity, in turn, was the best predictor of PAI-1, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, cholesterol/HDL levels (all P<0.01) and platelet reactivity (R=0.34, P=0.02).
Use of preventive pharmacologic therapies obviated the expected relationship between adiposity and CHD risk factors. However, a residual effect of insulin resistance is left untreated. Total adiposity and central adiposity were strong predictors of insulin sensitivity, which in turn predicted cardiac risk factors such as lipid concentrations, PAI-1 and platelet reactivity. Thus, while evidence-based pharmacologic treatments may diminish the statistical relationship between obesity and many cardiac risk factors, adiposity negatively impacts CHD risk by reducing tissue insulin sensitivity.
肥胖在一定程度上通过与高脂血症、高血压、凝血异常和胰岛素抵抗相关联,促进冠心病(CHD)的发生和发展。我们评估了在接受循证预防性药物治疗的已确诊冠心病患者中,这些关系是否仍然存在。
我们对74名体重指数(BMI)>27 kg/m²(平均32±4)的成年冠心病患者进行了一项横断面研究。研究对象的平均年龄为64±9岁(范围44 - 84岁)。
肥胖指标包括体重、BMI、腰围、脂肪量、腹内脂肪和皮下脂肪。危险因素指标包括胰岛素敏感性、空腹胰岛素水平、血脂谱、血压、C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂(PAI-1)和血小板反应性。药物使用情况包括阿司匹林(99%)、他汀类药物(84%)、β受体阻滞剂(71%)、ACE抑制剂或拮抗剂(37%)和氯吡格雷(28%)。
除了内脏脂肪与hs-CRP之间存在适度关联(r = 0.30,P = 0.02)外,肥胖参数与血脂浓度、血压、凝血异常或血小板反应性等危险因素指标之间没有直接关系。然而,BMI增加、腰围、脂肪量、腹部总脂肪和腹部皮下脂肪均与胰岛素敏感性(r值为 -0.30至 -0.45,P值为0.01至<0.001)和胰岛素浓度相关。反过来,胰岛素敏感性是PAI-1、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)水平、胆固醇/HDL水平(所有P<0.01)和血小板反应性的最佳预测指标(R = 0.34,P = 0.02)。
预防性药物治疗的使用消除了肥胖与冠心病危险因素之间的预期关系。然而,胰岛素抵抗的残余影响仍未得到治疗。总体肥胖和中心性肥胖是胰岛素敏感性的强预测指标,而胰岛素敏感性又反过来预测脂质浓度、PAI-1和血小板反应性等心脏危险因素。因此,虽然循证药物治疗可能会减弱肥胖与许多心脏危险因素之间的统计关系,但肥胖通过降低组织胰岛素敏感性对冠心病风险产生负面影响。