Pêgo-Fernandes Paulo M, Mariani Alessandro Wasum, Fernandes Fabio, Ianni Barbara M, Stolf Noedir Groppo, Jatene Fabio Biscegli
Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart Institute (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University Medical School, São Paulo, Brasil.
Heart Surg Forum. 2008;11(1):E62-5. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20071190.
The pericardial biopsy has opened a new perspective for the etiologic diagnosis of pericardial effusions, because adequate pericardial visualization via the use of a video camera can provide more accurate results. We assessed the usefulness of videopericardioscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial effusion of indeterminate origin.
We conducted a retrospective study of clinical data from patients who underwent videopericardioscopy examination for pericardial effusion without an established diagnosis. The video-assisted pericardioscopy procedure was performed through a small incision in the xiphoid area.
From January 1998 to January 2007, 101 consecutive patients underwent videopericardioscopy evaluation for pericardial effusion. Ten patients were excluded because of lack of data. Fifty men and 41 women were included (mean age, 50 years; range, 14-76 years). All of the patients had moderate or significant pericardial effusion as demonstrated by echocardiography or computed tomography. The following diagnoses for the pericardial effusions were established: nonspecific inflammation, 50 cases (54.94%); neoplastic disorders, 22 cases (24.17%); tuberculous, 11 cases (12.08%); bacterial inflammatory process, 3 cases (3.29%); chylopericardial, 2 cases (2.19%); fungal infection, 2 cases (2.19%); and viral infection, 1 case (1.09%). Pericardioscopy evaluation provided the definitive diagnosis via the pericardial biopsy in 36.26% of the cases and via the results of fluid analyses in 13.18% of the cases; the use of both methods established the definitive diagnosis in 45.05% of the cases in this group of patients. The overall morbidity rate was 4.3%, and the most common complication was arrhythmia due to intraoperative manipulation, which ceased with the removal of the instruments from the pericardial cavity. We had 1 death, by cardiac tamponade, in the perioperative period.
Videopericardioscopy is a safe and efficient method for obtaining a better diagnosis of and satisfactory therapeutic results for pericardial effusions of indeterminate cause, and such results are obtained via an improved exploration of the pericardial cavity.
心包活检为心包积液的病因诊断开辟了新的视角,因为通过使用摄像机进行充分的心包可视化检查可提供更准确的结果。我们评估了视频心包镜检查在不明原因心包积液诊断和治疗中的实用性。
我们对因心包积液接受视频心包镜检查但未确诊的患者的临床资料进行了回顾性研究。视频辅助心包镜检查通过剑突下区域的小切口进行。
从1998年1月至2007年1月,连续101例患者因心包积液接受了视频心包镜评估。10例患者因数据缺失被排除。纳入50名男性和41名女性(平均年龄50岁;范围14 - 76岁)。所有患者经超声心动图或计算机断层扫描显示有中度或大量心包积液。心包积液的诊断如下:非特异性炎症50例(54.94%);肿瘤性疾病22例(24.17%);结核11例(12.08%);细菌性炎症过程3例(3.29%);乳糜心包2例(2.19%);真菌感染2例(2.19%);病毒感染1例(1.09%)。心包镜评估在36.26%的病例中通过心包活检得出明确诊断,在13.18%的病例中通过液体分析结果得出明确诊断;在该组患者中,两种方法联合使用在45.05%的病例中确立了明确诊断。总体发病率为4.3%,最常见的并发症是术中操作引起的心律失常,随着器械从心包腔取出而停止。围手术期有1例因心脏压塞死亡。
视频心包镜检查是一种安全有效的方法,可更好地诊断不明原因的心包积液并获得满意的治疗效果,通过改进的心包腔探查获得此类结果。