Gerrand C H, Billingham L J, Woll P J, Grimer R J
North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle NE7 7DN, UK.
Sarcoma. 2007;2007:34128. doi: 10.1155/2007/34128.
Despite the clinical and financial implications, there is little evidence about how patients who have been treated for soft tissue sarcoma should be followed up. The purpose of this study was to determine current practice in the United Kingdom. 192 clinicians treating patients with soft tissue sarcoma were surveyed with a postal questionnaire enquiring about frequency and method of follow up and how patients would be followed up in each of 3 clinical scenarios: a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at low risk of relapse; a patient with a trunk or extremity tumour at high risk of relapse; and a patient with a retroperitoneal or abdominal tumour. 155 (81%) clinicians responded. Clinic visits and X-rays were the most frequently used methods of follow up. Chest CT scans, local site imaging, and blood tests were used infrequently. The intensity and methods of follow up varied with each of the clinical scenarios. There was a seven-to-twenty fold variation in cost between the least and the most expensive regimes. Respondents were generally supportive of the development of the clinical trial in this area.
尽管存在临床和经济方面的影响,但关于软组织肉瘤患者治疗后应如何进行随访的证据很少。本研究的目的是确定英国目前的做法。对192名治疗软组织肉瘤患者的临床医生进行了问卷调查,询问随访的频率和方法,以及在以下三种临床情况下如何对患者进行随访:复发风险低的躯干或四肢肿瘤患者;复发风险高的躯干或四肢肿瘤患者;腹膜后或腹部肿瘤患者。155名(81%)临床医生回复了问卷。门诊就诊和X光检查是最常用的随访方法。胸部CT扫描、局部部位成像和血液检查使用较少。随访的强度和方法因每种临床情况而异。最便宜和最昂贵方案之间的成本相差7至20倍。受访者普遍支持该领域临床试验的开展。