Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7923-7936. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09946-4. Epub 2021 May 10.
This study aimed to provide an insight into clinical decision-making and surveillance strategy of sarcoma specialists for patients with primary soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (eSTS). The secondary aim was to quantify the role of patient- and tumor-specific factors in the perioperative management.
Members of sarcoma societies were sent a Web-based 21-item survey about eSTS management. The survey concerned only primary resectable high-grade eSTS in adults.
The study enrolled 396 respondents. The majority of the surgical specialists thought the evidence for perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) for high-grade eSTS was insufficient. Radiotherapy (RTX) was less frequently offered in Asia than in North America and Europe. The specialties and continents also differed regarding the importance of patient and tumor characteristics influencing RTX and CTX recommendation. For surveillance after initial treatment outpatient visits, chest computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance images of the extremity were the methods primarily used. The specialists in North America preferred chest CT scan over chest x-ray, whereas those in Asia and Europe had no clear preference.
Specialty and continent are important factors contributing to the variation in clinical practice, treatment recommendations, and surveillance of patients with primary resectable high-grade eSTS.
本研究旨在深入了解肉瘤专家对四肢原发性软组织肉瘤(eSTS)患者的临床决策和监测策略。次要目的是量化患者和肿瘤特异性因素在围手术期管理中的作用。
肉瘤学会的成员收到了一份关于 eSTS 管理的基于网络的 21 项调查。该调查仅涉及成人原发性可切除的高级别 eSTS。
该研究共纳入 396 名受访者。大多数外科专家认为高级别 eSTS 围手术期化疗(CTX)的证据不足。与北美和欧洲相比,亚洲放射治疗(RTX)的应用频率较低。专业和大陆在影响 RTX 和 CTX 建议的患者和肿瘤特征的重要性方面也存在差异。对于初始治疗后的监测,门诊就诊、胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)和肢体磁共振成像(MRI)是主要使用的方法。北美的专家更喜欢胸部 CT 扫描而不是胸部 X 光,而亚洲和欧洲的专家则没有明显的偏好。
专业和大陆是导致原发性可切除高级别 eSTS 患者临床实践、治疗建议和监测差异的重要因素。