• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管镜及体外冲击波碎石术治疗较大肾盂结石

Ureteroscopic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for rather large renal pelvis calculi.

作者信息

Tavakkoli Tabasi Kamyar, Baghban Haghighi Mehri

机构信息

Department of Urology, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Urol J. 2007 Fall;4(4):221-5.

PMID:18270946
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the results and complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) plus retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy using laser and pneumatic lithotriptors with SWL monotherapy for renal pelvic calculi between 2 cm and 3 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 55 patients with 2- to 3-cm pelvic calculi were assigned into groups 1 and 2, including 22 and 33 patients, respectively. Patients in group 1 first underwent laser pneumatic lithotripsy and insertion of a double-J ureteral catheter and then underwent SWL 2 to 4 weeks thereafter. In group 2, the patients underwent SWL after double-J ureteral catheter insertion. The stone-free rate, complications, and cost effectiveness were evaluated 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Five patients (22.7%) in group 1, had their calculi completely fragmented after ureteroscopy and retrograde lithotripsy without any need for further SWL. In 9 patients (40.9%), after a single session of SWL, and in 3 (13.6%), after 2 sessions, fragmentation was completed. In group 2, successful treatment was achieved after 1 and 2 SWL sessions in 6 (18.2%) and 8 (24.2%) patients, respectively. The stone-free rate was significantly higher in the patients of group1 than those in group 2 (77.3% versus 42.4%, respectively; P = .01). The period of anesthesia was 23.1 minutes (during ureteroscopy) in group 1 and 13.2 minutes in group 2 (during cystoscopy or ureteroscopy and insertion of ureteral catheter). No significant complication was reported in neither of the groups. The mean costs of the treatment were US $ 400 and US $ 370 in groups 1 and 2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ureteroscopic lithotripsy before SWL is a rational method for the treatment of the rather large renal pelvic calculi with fairly acceptable costs.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是比较体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)联合使用激光和气压弹道碎石器的逆行输尿管镜碎石术与单纯SWL治疗2至3厘米肾盂结石的结果和并发症。

材料与方法

总共55例患有2至3厘米肾盂结石的患者被分为1组和2组,分别包括22例和33例患者。1组患者首先接受激光气压弹道碎石术并插入双J输尿管导管,然后在2至4周后接受SWL。2组患者在插入双J输尿管导管后接受SWL。术后3个月评估结石清除率、并发症和成本效益。

结果

1组中有5例患者(22.7%)在输尿管镜检查和逆行碎石术后结石完全破碎,无需进一步SWL。9例患者(40.9%)在单次SWL后,3例患者(13.6%)在2次SWL后结石破碎完成。2组中,分别有6例(18.2%)和8例(24.2%)患者在1次和2次SWL后成功治疗。1组患者的结石清除率显著高于2组(分别为77.3%和42.4%;P = .01)。1组的麻醉时间为23.1分钟(输尿管镜检查期间),2组为13.2分钟(膀胱镜检查或输尿管镜检查及输尿管导管插入期间)。两组均未报告严重并发症。1组和2组的平均治疗费用分别为400美元和370美元。

结论

SWL前进行输尿管镜碎石术是治疗较大肾盂结石的合理方法,成本相当可接受。

相似文献

1
Ureteroscopic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for rather large renal pelvis calculi.输尿管镜及体外冲击波碎石术治疗较大肾盂结石
Urol J. 2007 Fall;4(4):221-5.
2
Transureteral lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in management of upper ureteral calculi: a comparative study.经输尿管碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗上段输尿管结石的比较研究
Urol J. 2007 Fall;4(4):207-11.
3
Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.逆行输尿管肾盂镜治疗2厘米及以上上尿路结石和小型鹿角形结石。
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):346-51.
4
A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.一项比较冲击波碎石术和半刚性输尿管镜治疗输尿管上段结石的前瞻性随机研究。
Urology. 2009 Dec;74(6):1216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.076. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
5
Adjunctive tamsulosin improves stone free rate after ureteroscopic lithotripsy of large renal and ureteric calculi: a prospective randomized study.辅助坦索罗辛可提高输尿管镜碎石术治疗大肾和输尿管结石的无石率:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1040-2. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1257. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
6
Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.近端输尿管结石的治疗:钬激光输尿管碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术的对比
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1972-6.
7
Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.比较冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜碎石术治疗上段输尿管大结石的前瞻性随机试验。
Urology. 2006 Mar;67(3):480-4; discussion 484. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.067.
8
Extracorporeal shock-wave versus pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of lower ureteral calculi.体外冲击波与气压弹道输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的比较
Asian J Androl. 2002 Dec;4(4):303-5.
9
Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.冲击波碎石术与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗下极肾结石的成本效益和效率比较。
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1913-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10172.x. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.输尿管镜激光碎石术与冲击波碎石术治疗中国东部输尿管结石的成本效益分析
Urol Int. 2011;86(4):470-5. doi: 10.1159/000324479. Epub 2011 May 18.