Park Maxwell C, Idjadi Jeremy A, Elattrache Neal S, Tibone James E, McGarry Michelle H, Lee Thay Q
Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 5601 De Soto Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 91365, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2008 May;36(5):893-900. doi: 10.1177/0363546507313092. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
Allowing for humeral external rotation while loading rotator cuff repairs has been shown to affect tendon biomechanics when compared with testing with the humerus fixed. Adding dynamic external rotation to a tendon-loading model using footprint-restoring repairs may improve our understanding of rotator cuff repair response to a common postoperative motion.
A tendon suture-bridging repair will demonstrate better load sharing compared to a double-row repair, and there will be a differential gap formation between the anterior and posterior tendon regions.
Controlled laboratory study.
In 6 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders, a tendon suture-bridging rotator cuff repair was performed; a suture limb from each of 2 medial anchors was bridged over the tendon and fixed laterally with an interference screw. In 6 contralateral match-paired specimens, a double-row repair was performed. For all specimens, a custom jig was employed that allowed dynamic external rotation (0 degrees to 30 degrees ) with loading. A materials testing machine was used to cyclically load each repair from 0 N to 90 N for 30 cycles; each repair was then loaded to failure. A deformation rate of 1 mm/s was employed for all tests. Gap formation between tendon edge and insertion was measured using video digitizing software.
The yield load for the suture-bridging technique (161.88 +/- 35.09 N) was significantly larger than the double-row technique (135.17 +/- 24.03 N) (P = .026). The yield gap between tendon and lateral footprint was significantly greater anteriorly than posteriorly (1.62 +/- 0.82 mm and 0.68 +/- 0.47 mm, respectively) for the suture-bridging technique (P = .024) but not for the double-row technique (1.35 +/- 0.52 mm and 1.05 +/- 0.50 mm, respectively) (P = .34). There were no differences for gap formation, stiffness, ultimate load to failure, and energy absorbed to failure between the 2 repairs (P > .05). The anterior regions of the repair were the first to fail in all constructs. The suture-bridging repair remained interconnected for 5 of 6 repairs.
The tendon suture-bridging rotator cuff repair has a yield load that is higher than the double-row repair when allowing for external rotation during load testing. External rotation can accentuate gap formation anteriorly at a repaired rotator cuff footprint.
Based on the tension of repair, there may be a role for reinforcing the repair anteriorly and limiting external rotation postoperatively.
与肱骨固定情况下的测试相比,在对肩袖修复进行加载时允许肱骨外旋已被证明会影响肌腱生物力学。在使用足迹恢复修复的肌腱加载模型中增加动态外旋,可能会增进我们对肩袖修复对常见术后活动反应的理解。
与双排修复相比,肌腱缝合桥接修复将表现出更好的负荷分担,并且肌腱前后区域之间会形成不同的间隙。
对照实验室研究。
在6个新鲜冷冻的人体尸体肩部上,进行了肌腱缝合桥接肩袖修复;来自2个内侧锚钉的每一个的缝线肢体跨过肌腱桥接,并通过干涉螺钉横向固定。在6个对侧匹配标本中,进行了双排修复。对于所有标本,使用了一个定制夹具,该夹具允许在加载时进行动态外旋(0度至30度)。使用材料试验机对每个修复进行从0 N到90 N的循环加载30次;然后将每个修复加载至破坏。所有测试均采用1 mm/s的变形速率。使用视频数字化软件测量肌腱边缘与插入点之间的间隙形成。
缝合桥接技术的屈服载荷(161.88±35.09 N)显著大于双排技术(135.17±24.03 N)(P = .026)。对于缝合桥接技术,肌腱与外侧足迹之间的屈服间隙在前侧显著大于后侧(分别为1.62±0.82 mm和0.68±0.47 mm)(P = .024),但对于双排技术则不然(分别为1.35±0.52 mm和1.05±0.50 mm)(P = .34)。两种修复之间在间隙形成、刚度、极限破坏载荷和吸收至破坏的能量方面均无差异(P>.05)。在所有结构中,修复的前部是最先失效的部位。6个修复中有5个修复中的缝合桥接修复仍保持连接。
在负荷测试期间允许外旋时,肌腱缝合桥接肩袖修复的屈服载荷高于双排修复。外旋会加剧修复的肩袖足迹处前方的间隙形成。
基于修复的张力,可能有必要在前方加强修复并在术后限制外旋。