Starzyk Katherine B, Ross Michael
Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;34(3):366-80. doi: 10.1177/0146167207311280.
Groups around the world are seeking reparations for historical harms. In three studies, the authors examined if people are more inclined to support a historical victim group if the group continues to suffer today because of an earlier harm. In Study 1, participants perceived greater victim suffering when the harm was recent and the degree of perceived suffering positively related to victim group support. In Studies 2 and 3, the authors manipulated continued victim suffering and the feasibility of material reparations. Both variables affected victim group support, but experienced sympathy and injustice judgments mediated their effects. Suffering victims elicited more compassion when reparations seemed feasible but were treated the same as nonsuffering victims when reparations seemed unfeasible. Suffering victims were also treated equally irrespective of feasibility of reparations, whereas nonsuffering victims were treated significantly less favorably when reparations seemed feasible, versus unfeasible.
世界各地的团体都在为历史伤害寻求赔偿。在三项研究中,作者探讨了如果一个历史受害者群体因早期伤害至今仍在受苦,人们是否更倾向于支持该群体。在研究1中,当伤害是近期发生的时,参与者察觉到受害者遭受了更大的痛苦,且察觉到的痛苦程度与对受害者群体的支持呈正相关。在研究2和3中,作者操纵了受害者持续受苦的情况以及物质赔偿的可行性。这两个变量都影响了对受害者群体的支持,但感受到的同情和不公正判断介导了它们的影响。当赔偿似乎可行时,受苦的受害者会引发更多同情,但当赔偿似乎不可行时,他们与未受苦的受害者受到相同的对待。无论赔偿的可行性如何,受苦的受害者都受到平等对待,而当赔偿似乎可行而非不可行时,未受苦的受害者受到的待遇明显较差。