• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Feasibility of determining myocardial infarction type from medical record review.通过病历回顾确定心肌梗死类型的可行性。
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Feb;24(2):115-7. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70565-8.
2
Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of ST-Segment-Elevation Versus Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.心房颤动与ST段抬高型心肌梗死和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死风险:社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究
Circulation. 2015 May 26;131(21):1843-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014145. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
3
Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction in the Italian CCU network: the BLITZ study.意大利冠心病监护病房网络中急性心肌梗死的流行病学:闪电研究
Eur Heart J. 2003 Sep;24(18):1616-29. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00278-1.
4
Long-term prognosis of first myocardial infarction according to the electrocardiographic pattern (ST elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and non-classified myocardial infarction) and revascularization procedures.根据心电图模式(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和未分类型心肌梗死)和血运重建术对首次心肌梗死的长期预后进行评估。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 15;108(8):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
5
Management and mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation vs. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Data from the Malopolska Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes.非ST段抬高型与ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的管理与死亡率。来自小波兰急性冠脉综合征登记处的数据。
Kardiol Pol. 2009 Feb;67(2):115-20; discussion 121-2.
6
Is There a Sex Gap in Surviving an Acute Coronary Syndrome or Subsequent Development of Heart Failure?急性冠状动脉综合征存活或随后心力衰竭发展中是否存在性别差异?
Circulation. 2020 Dec 8;142(23):2231-2239. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048015. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
7
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Changes in Patient Characteristics, Management, and 6-Month Outcomes Over a Period of 20 Years in the FAST-MI Program (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) 1995 to 2015.急性心肌梗死:FAST-MI 项目(1995 年至 2015 年法国急性 ST 段抬高或非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死注册研究)20 年来患者特征、治疗方法的变化和 6 个月预后
Circulation. 2017 Nov 14;136(20):1908-1919. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030798. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
8
Identification of myocardial infarction type from electronic hospital data in England and Australia: a comparative data linkage study.从英国和澳大利亚的电子医院数据中识别心肌梗死类型:一项比较性数据链接研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e019217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019217.
9
Differences in the profile, treatment, and prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock by myocardial infarction classification: A report from NCDR.根据心肌梗死分类的心源性休克患者的特征、治疗及预后差异:美国国家心血管数据注册(NCDR)报告
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Nov;6(6):708-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000262. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型与非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死后的指南遵循情况
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):654-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963959. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and utility of ICD-10 administrative health data for identifying ST- and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on physician chart review.基于医生病历审查,ICD - 10管理性健康数据用于识别ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的有效性和实用性。
CMAJ Open. 2015 Oct 2;3(4):E413-8. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150060. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.
2
Direct emergency medical services transport in STEMI: breaking the bank for non-PCI capable hospitals?ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的直接急诊医疗服务转运:对无PCI能力的医院来说成本过高?
Open Heart. 2015 Jul 2;2(1):e000139. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000139. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the sensitivity, positive predictive value, false-positive rate, and comparability ratio of hospital discharge diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infarction in four US communities, 1987-2000.1987 - 2000年美国四个社区急性心肌梗死出院诊断编码的敏感性、阳性预测值、假阳性率及可比率趋势
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Dec 15;160(12):1137-46. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh341.
2
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction).ACC/AHA ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南——执行摘要。美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订1999年急性心肌梗死患者管理指南写作委员会)报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 4;44(3):671-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.002.
3
Accuracy of Medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records.基于医疗保险索赔数据诊断急性心肌梗死的准确性:通过审查医院记录评估阳性预测值。
Am Heart J. 2004 Jul;148(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.013.
4
The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry.常规统计中急性心肌梗死诊断的有效性:死亡率和医院出院数据与丹麦MONICA注册中心的比较。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;56(2):124-30. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00591-7.
5
Identifying acute myocardial infarction: effects on treatment and mortality, and implications for National Service Framework audit.
QJM. 2003 Mar;96(3):203-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcg030.
6
ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2002年不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南更新——总结篇:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南特别工作组(不稳定型心绞痛患者管理委员会)报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 2;40(7):1366-74. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02336-7.
7
A multicenter study of the coding accuracy of hospital discharge administrative data for patients admitted to cardiac care units in Ontario.安大略省心脏监护病房收治患者的医院出院管理数据编码准确性的多中心研究。
Am Heart J. 2002 Aug;144(2):290-6. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.123839.
8
Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)中急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者的基线特征、管理措施及院内结局
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Aug 15;90(4):358-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02489-x.
9
A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy.出院编码准确性的系统评价。
J Public Health Med. 2001 Sep;23(3):205-11. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/23.3.205.
10
Rationale and design of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) Project: a multinational registry of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes.GRACE(全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究)项目的原理与设计:一项针对急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者的跨国注册研究。
Am Heart J. 2001 Feb;141(2):190-9. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.112404.

通过病历回顾确定心肌梗死类型的可行性。

Feasibility of determining myocardial infarction type from medical record review.

作者信息

Woo Ken S, Ghali William A, Southern Danielle A, Tu Jack V, Parsons Gerry, Graham Michelle M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2008 Feb;24(2):115-7. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70565-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70565-8
PMID:18273483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2644564/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital discharge data are used extensively in health research. Given the clinical differences between ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), it is important that these entities be distinguishable in a medical record. The authors sought to determine the extent to which the type of MI is recorded in medical records, as well as the consistency of this designation within individual records.

METHODS

Records of all MI patients admitted to a tertiary care centre in Canada from April 1, 2000, to March 31, 2001, were reviewed. Documentation and consistency of the use of the terms STEMI (Q wave, ST elevation or transmural MI) or NSTEMI (non-Q wave, subendocardial or nontransmural MI) were assessed in the admission history, progress notes, coronary care unit summary and discharge summary sections of each record.

RESULTS

Missing data were common; each chart section mentioned MI type in fewer than one-half of charts. When information was combined, it was possible to determine the type of MI in 81.1% of cases. MI type was consistently described as STEMI in 48.7% of cases, and as NSTEMI in 32.4%. Of concern, MI type was discrepant across sections in 10.5% of cases and missing entirely in 8.4% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The designation of MI cases as STEMI or NSTEMI is both incomplete and inconsistent in hospital records. This has implications for health services research conducted retrospectively using medical record data, because it is difficult to comprehensively study processes and outcomes of MI care if the type cannot be retrospectively determined.

摘要

背景

医院出院数据在健康研究中被广泛使用。鉴于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)之间的临床差异,在医疗记录中区分这些实体非常重要。作者试图确定心肌梗死类型在医疗记录中的记录程度,以及该指定在个体记录中的一致性。

方法

回顾了2000年4月1日至2001年3月31日期间入住加拿大一家三级护理中心的所有心肌梗死患者的记录。在每份记录的入院病史、病程记录、冠心病监护病房总结和出院总结部分,评估STEMI(Q波、ST段抬高或透壁性心肌梗死)或NSTEMI(非Q波、心内膜下或非透壁性心肌梗死)术语使用的记录情况和一致性。

结果

缺失数据很常见;每个图表部分提及心肌梗死类型的图表不到一半。当信息合并时,81.1%的病例能够确定心肌梗死类型。48.7%的病例心肌梗死类型一直被描述为STEMI,32.4%的病例被描述为NSTEMI。令人担忧的是,10.5%的病例各部分之间心肌梗死类型不一致,8.4%的病例完全缺失。

结论

在医院记录中,将心肌梗死病例指定为STEMI或NSTEMI既不完整也不一致。这对使用医疗记录数据进行的回顾性健康服务研究有影响,因为如果不能回顾性确定类型,就很难全面研究心肌梗死护理的过程和结果。