• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸主动脉瘤修复术。直接住院费用及诊断相关分组报销。

Thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Direct hospital cost and Diagnosis Related Group reimbursement.

作者信息

Mishra Vinod, Geiran Odd, Krohg-Sørensen Kirsten, Andresen Sølvi

机构信息

Health Professional Support Department, Rikshospitalet Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, and Faculty Division Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand Cardiovasc J. 2008 Feb;42(1):77-84. doi: 10.1080/14017430701716814.

DOI:10.1080/14017430701716814
PMID:18273734
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to analyze direct hospital cost and to compare cost with existing DRG reimbursement for open repair of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic disease. STUDY SAMPLE AND METHODOLOGY: Between January 2003 and September 2003, the cost of treatment for 24 surgical procedures on ascending aorta and arch, descending or thoraco-abdominal aortic disease were examined prospectively. Seven patients had urgent or emergency surgeries. Ten had sternotomies for disease of the ascending aorta and aortic arch; two had left thoracotomies and three thoraco-laparotomy incisions with procedures performed on x-corporeal circulation. Nine other patients had more distal thoraco-abdominal aortic operations with a clamp-and-sew technique. Micro-cost analysis was performed on each hospital stay, in addition overhead hospital costs were allocated to each procedure.

RESULTS

The patients were grouped by discharge diagnosis (ICD-10) and surgical procedure performed (NCSP) into Norwegian DRG code. Patient with surgery on ascending aorta & aortic arch were allocated to DRG 108 (n=9) or 483 (tracheostomy, n=1) while patient with surgery on descending or thoraco-abdominal aorta were allocated to DRG 108 (n=3), 110 (n=4), 111 (n=4) or 483 (tracheostomy, n=3). The mean EuroSCORE for patients with proximal aortic disease was 11 (5-18), and the length of stay was 5 days (range 3-8 days), spending 2 days (range 1-7 days) in thoracic intensive care unit. For patients with distal aortic disease the mean Euroscore was 7 (2-14), and the mean length of stay 10 days (range 4-23 days) with a mean 4 days (range 1-13 days) in intensive care unit. Eight patients developed medical problems requiring new surgical procedures or prolonged ICU stay. The average direct hospital cost for proximal aortic surgery was USD 15,877 (USD 1=NOK 7.5) while the respective 100% DRG reimbursement including one patient needing a tracheostomy, was 19 803 USD. For patients with distal aortic disease, average direct hospital cost was 23 005 USD and DRG reimbursement including patients needing a tracheostomy was 31543 USD.

CONCLUSION

Our results underscore previous findings that these patients are resource intensive. This study shows that Norwegian 100% DRG reimbursement did over-compensate observed total hospital costs in this cohort. Detailed analysis showed that this was due to the higher DRG reimbursement for patients needing prolonged ventilatory support. Thus the actual DRG reimbursement seems to be relevant to the tertiary hospital actual costs when these complicated patients are considered as a group. It remains however unclear whether this reimbursement is sufficient to support the scientific infrastructure for new knowledge and skills needed for the further refinement of treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是分析直接住院费用,并将其与现有的用于胸主动脉和胸腹主动脉疾病开放修复的疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)报销费用进行比较。

研究样本与方法

在2003年1月至2003年9月期间,前瞻性地研究了24例升主动脉和主动脉弓、降主动脉或胸腹主动脉疾病手术治疗的费用。7例患者进行了急诊或紧急手术。10例因升主动脉和主动脉弓疾病行胸骨切开术;2例行左胸切开术,3例行胸腹联合切开术并在体外循环下进行手术。另外9例患者采用钳夹缝合技术进行了更远端的胸腹主动脉手术。对每个住院期间进行微观成本分析,此外还将医院间接费用分摊到每个手术中。

结果

根据出院诊断(国际疾病分类第十版,ICD - 10)和所实施的手术程序(挪威国家手术程序编码,NCSP)将患者分组为挪威DRG编码。升主动脉和主动脉弓手术患者被分配到DRG 108(n = 9)或483(气管切开术,n = 1),而降主动脉或胸腹主动脉手术患者被分配到DRG 108(n = 3)、110(n = 4)、111(n = 4)或483(气管切开术,n = 3)。近端主动脉疾病患者的平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)评分为11(5 - 18),住院时间为5天(范围3 - 8天),在胸外科重症监护病房停留2天(范围1 - 7天)。对于远端主动脉疾病患者,平均Euroscore评分为7(2 - 14),平均住院时间为10天(范围4 - 23天),在重症监护病房平均停留4天(范围1 - 13天)。8例患者出现需要新的手术程序或延长重症监护病房停留时间的医疗问题。近端主动脉手术的平均直接住院费用为15,877美元(1美元 = 7.5挪威克朗),而包括1例需要气管切开术患者在内的100% DRG报销费用为19,803美元。对于远端主动脉疾病患者,平均直接住院费用为23,005美元,包括需要气管切开术患者在内的DRG报销费用为31,543美元。

结论

我们的结果强调了先前的发现,即这些患者资源消耗大。本研究表明,挪威100%的DRG报销费用在该队列中对观察到的总住院费用补偿过度。详细分析表明,这是由于对需要延长通气支持的患者给予了更高的DRG报销费用。因此,当将这些复杂患者视为一个群体时,实际的DRG报销费用似乎与三级医院的实际成本相关。然而,尚不清楚这种报销是否足以支持进一步完善治疗所需新知识和技能的科学基础设施。

相似文献

1
Thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Direct hospital cost and Diagnosis Related Group reimbursement.胸主动脉瘤修复术。直接住院费用及诊断相关分组报销。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2008 Feb;42(1):77-84. doi: 10.1080/14017430701716814.
2
Costs and reimbursement gaps after implementation of third-generation left ventricular assist devices.第三代左心室辅助装置应用后的成本和报销缺口。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Jan;29(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.06.029. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
3
A comparison of actual registered costs and costs derived from diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) for patients undergoing heart transplantation, lung transplantation, and thoracotomy for other lung diseases.对接受心脏移植、肺移植及因其他肺部疾病接受开胸手术的患者的实际登记费用与根据诊断相关分组(DRG)得出的费用进行比较。
Transpl Int. 2001 Dec;14(6):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s001470100001.
4
[Reimbursement of patients with high costs in a department of otorhinolaryngology of maximum care and refinancing by the German DRG system].[德国疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)系统对一家三级甲等耳鼻喉科高费用患者的报销及再融资情况]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2005 Aug;84(8):594-601. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861047.
5
A comparison of actual cost, DRG-based cost, and hospital reimbursement for liver transplant patients.肝移植患者实际成本、基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)的成本及医院报销情况的比较。
Transpl Int. 2002 Oct;15(9-10):439-45. doi: 10.1007/s00147-002-0430-0. Epub 2002 Sep 24.
6
Hospital costs for endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术和开放修复术的住院费用。
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jul;197(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00341-7.
7
Current hospital costs and medicare reimbursement for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.当前腹主动脉瘤血管腔内修复术的医院成本及医疗保险报销情况。
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Feb;37(2):272-9. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.118.
8
Combined aortic debranching and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) effective but at a cost.联合主动脉去分支术和胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)有效但有代价。
Arch Surg. 2009 Mar;144(3):222-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.3.
9
Pulmonary complications after descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: predictors, prevention, and treatment.降主动脉和胸腹主动脉瘤修复术后的肺部并发症:预测因素、预防及治疗
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Feb;83(2):S870-6; discussion S890-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.099.
10
Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with marfan syndrome.马凡综合征患者的胸腹主动脉瘤修复术
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Feb;35(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.10.013.

引用本文的文献

1
DRGKB: a knowledgebase of worldwide diagnosis-related groups' practices for comparison, evaluation and knowledge-guided application.DRGKB:一个用于比较、评估和知识引导应用的全球诊断相关分组实践知识库。
Database (Oxford). 2024 Jun 6;2024. doi: 10.1093/database/baae046.
2
Financial Impact of Deep Sternal Wound Infections After Coronary Surgery: A Microcosting Analysis.冠状动脉手术后胸骨深部伤口感染的财务影响:微观成本分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Aug 4;38(5):e20220261. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0261.
3
Cost-utility analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.
比较腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术的成本效用分析。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Jun 19;13:217-224. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S138516. eCollection 2017.