• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[二次数据分析的良好实践,首次修订]

[Good practice of secondary data analysis, first revision].

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Jan;70(1):54-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022529.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1022529
PMID:18273764
Abstract

After publication of the "Good Practice Secondary Data Analysis" (GPS) in 2005, the scientific use of secondary data has further increased. Based on several feedbacks to the first version of this guideline, the Working Group "Collection and Use of Secondary Data" (AGENS) of the German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention (DGSMP) together with the working group 'Epidemiological Methods' of the German Society of Epidemiology (DGEpi), the German Society for Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology (GMDS) and the German Society of Social Medicine and Prevention (DGSMP) undertook the first revision of the GPS, which will be implemented in the beginning of 2008. The second version of the GPS was restructured in relation to the first version. Now, the numbering of the guidelines is the same as that of the Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP). The GPS guidelines also have the same wording as in the GEP. The specific conditions and requirements of secondary data analysis were addressed in the explanations of the guidelines and their recommendations. The glossary at the end of the GPS was extended. In the last three years the GPS has become established as a standard for secondary data analyses. Additionally, the GPS may be used as a basis for contractual arrangements between data owners and researchers. This version of the GPS is valid to the end of 2010.

摘要

2005年《二次数据分析良好实践》(GPS)发布后,二次数据的科学应用进一步增加。基于对该指南第一版的若干反馈,德国社会医学与预防学会(DGSMP)的“二次数据收集与使用”工作组(AGENS)与德国流行病学学会(DGEpi)的“流行病学方法”工作组、德国医学信息学、生物统计学与流行病学学会(GMDS)以及德国社会医学与预防学会(DGSMP)对GPS进行了首次修订,修订版将于2008年初实施。GPS的第二版相对于第一版进行了结构调整。现在,指南的编号与《良好流行病学实践》(GEP)相同。GPS指南的措辞也与GEP一致。二次数据分析的具体条件和要求在指南的解释及其建议中有所阐述。GPS末尾的术语表得到了扩充。在过去三年里,GPS已成为二次数据分析的标准。此外,GPS可作为数据所有者与研究人员之间合同安排的基础。本版GPS有效期至2010年底。

相似文献

1
[Good practice of secondary data analysis, first revision].[二次数据分析的良好实践,首次修订]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Jan;70(1):54-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022529.
2
[GPS--good practice secondary data analysis. Working Group for the Survey and Utilization of Secondary Data (AGENS) of the German Society for Social Medicine and Prevention (DGSMP)].[GPS——良好实践二次数据分析。德国社会医学与预防学会(DGSMP)二次数据调查与利用工作组(AGENS)]
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Jun;67(6):416-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858356.
3
[Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations].[二次数据分析的良好实践(GPS):指南与建议]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Feb;77(2):120-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396815. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
4
Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology.确保良好流行病学实践(GEP)的指南和建议:德国流行病学学会制定的指南。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):301-317. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00500-x. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen).德国二次数据分析报告标准共识,第2版(STROSA - 二次数据分析标准化报告流程)
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Sep;78(S 01):e145-e160. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108647. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
[Guidelines and recommendations for insuring good epidemiological practice (GEP). German Professional Society of Epidemiology].[确保良好流行病学实践(GEP)的指南与建议。德国流行病学专业协会]
Gesundheitswesen. 2000 May;62(5):295-302.
7
Assessment of publications using methods of evidence-based medicine: an introduction using a dermatological clinical study.使用循证医学方法评估出版物:以一项皮肤病临床研究为例进行介绍
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007 Sep;5(9):793-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06519.x.
8
[Data documentation and data management with guidelines, experiences, caveats, and recommendations].[带有指南、经验、注意事项及建议的数据记录与数据管理]
Onkologie. 2008;31 Suppl 2:7-13. doi: 10.1159/000113450. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
9
[Smoking as potential confounder in german epidemiological studies: standardization of assessment, quantification, and analysis].[吸烟作为德国流行病学研究中的潜在混杂因素:评估、量化及分析的标准化]
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Nov;67(11):795-802. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858807.
10
[Development and implementation of the guideline "Diagnosis of and Therapy for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome"].[《腕管综合征的诊断与治疗指南》的制定与实施]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2007 Aug;39(4):289-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965314.

引用本文的文献

1
The Long-Term Sequelae of Traumatic Brain Injury Over 10 Years of Follow-Up—A Matched Cohort Study Based on Routine Data of a Statutory Health Insurance Carrier.颅脑创伤 10 年随访的长期后果——一项基于法定健康保险公司常规数据的配对队列研究。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Apr 21;120(16):271-276. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0046.
2
An Intersectional Perspective on the Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening among Migrants. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Survey Data from Austria.移民群体中宫颈癌筛查利用情况的交叉性视角:来自奥地利调查数据的横断面分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 2;13(23):6082. doi: 10.3390/cancers13236082.
3
Assessment of quality of life in individuals with chronic headache. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF.
慢性头痛患者生活质量评估。WHOQOL-BREF 的心理测量特性。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Jul 3;20(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01845-7.
4
Utilization of cervical cancer screening among migrants and non-migrants in Germany: results from a large-scale population survey.德国移民和非移民中宫颈癌筛查的利用情况:一项大规模人群调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8006-4.
5
Comparison of Different Strategies to Measure Medication Adherence via Claims Data in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.比较通过慢性心力衰竭患者的理赔数据来衡量药物依从性的不同策略。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):211-218. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1378. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Costs of dose escalation among ulcerative colitis patients treated with adalimumab in Germany.德国阿达木单抗治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者剂量升级的成本。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0953-z. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
7
Disparities in health care outcomes between immigrants and the majority population in Germany: A trend analysis, 2006-2014.2006 - 2014年德国移民与多数人口在医疗保健结果方面的差异:一项趋势分析
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 23;13(1):e0191732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191732. eCollection 2018.
8
Drug-eluting stents in clinical routine: a 1-year follow-up analysis based on German health insurance administrative data from 2008 to 2014.临床常规中的药物洗脱支架:基于2008年至2014年德国医疗保险行政数据的1年随访分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):e017460. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017460.
9
Oral health behaviour in migrant and non-migrant adults in Germany: the utilization of regular dental check-ups.德国移民和非移民成年人的口腔健康行为:定期牙科检查的利用情况
BMC Oral Health. 2017 May 19;17(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0377-2.
10
Fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes under different antidiabetic treatment regimens: a retrospective database analysis in primary care.2型糖尿病患者在不同抗糖尿病治疗方案下的骨折风险:基层医疗中的一项回顾性数据库分析
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016 Feb 19;9:17-23. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S101370. eCollection 2016.