Goosey-Tolfrey Victoria L, Tolfrey Keith
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Centre for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2008 Mar;26(5):511-7. doi: 10.1080/02640410701624531.
The aims of this study were two-fold: (1) to consider the criterion-related validity of the multi-stage fitness test (MSFT) by comparing the predicted maximal oxygen uptake (.VO(2max)) and distance travelled with peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) measured using a wheelchair ergometer (n = 24); and (2) to assess the reliability of the MSFT in a sub-sample of wheelchair athletes (n = 10) measured on two occasions. Twenty-four trained male wheelchair basketball players (mean age 29 years, s = 6) took part in the study. All participants performed a continuous incremental wheelchair ergometer test to volitional exhaustion to determine .VO(2peak), and the MSFT on an indoor wooden basketball court. Mean ergometer .VO(2peak) was 2.66 litres . min(-1) (s = 0.49) and peak heart rate was 188 beats . min(-1) (s = 10). The group mean MSFT distance travelled was 2056 m (s = 272) and mean peak heart rate was 186 beats . min(-1) (s = 11). Low to moderate correlations (rho = 0.39 to 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.02 to 0.69 and 0.23 to 0.80) were found between distance travelled in the MSFT and different expressions of wheelchair ergometer .VO(2peak). There was a mean bias of -1.9 beats . min(-1) (95% CI: -5.9 to 2.0) and standard error of measurement of 6.6 beats . min(-1) (95% CI: 5.4 to 8.8) between the ergometer and MSFT peak heart rates. A similar comparison of ergometer and predicted MSFT .VO(2peak) values revealed a large mean systematic bias of 15.3 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1) (95% CI: 13.2 to 17.4) and standard error of measurement of 3.5 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1) (95% CI: 2.8 to 4.6). Small standard errors of measurement for MSFT distance travelled (86 m; 95% CI: 59 to 157) and MSFT peak heart rate (2.4 beats . min(-1); 95% CI: 1.7 to 4.5) suggest that these variables can be measured reliably. The results suggest that the multi-stage fitness test provides reliable data with this population, but does not fully reflect the aerobic capacity of wheelchair athletes directly.
(1)通过比较预测的最大摄氧量(.VO₂max)以及使用轮椅测力计测量的达到峰值摄氧量(VO₂peak)时行进的距离,来考量多阶段体能测试(MSFT)与标准相关的效度(n = 24);(2)评估在两次测量的轮椅运动员子样本(n = 10)中MSFT的可靠性。24名训练有素的男性轮椅篮球运动员(平均年龄29岁,s = 6)参与了该研究。所有参与者进行了持续递增的轮椅测力计测试直至自愿力竭,以确定.VO₂peak,并在室内木质篮球场上进行了MSFT。测力计的平均.VO₂peak为2.66升·分钟⁻¹(s = 0.49),峰值心率为188次·分钟⁻¹(s = 10)。MSFT行进的组平均距离为2056米(s = 272),平均峰值心率为186次·分钟⁻¹(s = 11)。在MSFT行进的距离与轮椅测力计.VO₂peak的不同表达式之间发现了低到中等的相关性(rho = 0.39至0.58;95%置信区间[CI]:-0.02至0.69和0.23至0.80)。测力计和MSFT的峰值心率之间的平均偏差为-1.9次·分钟⁻¹(95% CI:-5.9至2.0),测量标准误差为6.6次·分钟⁻¹(95% CI:5.4至8.8)。对测力计和预测的MSFT.VO₂peak值进行类似比较,发现平均系统偏差很大,为15.3毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹(95% CI:13.2至17.4),测量标准误差为3.5毫升·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹(95% CI:2.8至4.6)。MSFT行进距离(86米;95% CI:59至157)和MSFT峰值心率(2.4次·分钟⁻¹;95% CI:1.7至4.5)较小的测量标准误差表明这些变量可以可靠地测量。结果表明,多阶段体能测试为该人群提供了可靠的数据,但不能直接完全反映轮椅运动员的有氧能力。