Kharbanda Anupam B, Fishman Steven J, Bachur Richard G
Division of Emergency Medicine, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;15(2):119-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00029.x.
To compare the interexaminer reliability and ability to predict appendicitis between pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) and senior surgical residents.
The authors conducted a prospective cohort study of children aged 3 to 18 years of age with signs and symptoms suspicious for appendicitis. Patients were initially examined by a pediatric EP attending and then by a consulting senior surgical resident. Physicians reported the presence or absence of specific historical and physical exam findings and predicted the likelihood the patient had appendicitis. Interexaminer reliability of historical and physical exam findings was compared (kappa statistic). Distributions and median probabilities of appendicitis were calculated for pediatric EP and surgeon predictions.
The authors evaluated 350 patients with acute abdominal pain. Historical questions revealed slight to very good agreement (kappa statistic range 0.33-0.82) between physician types, whereas physical examination findings exhibited poor to fair agreement (range 0.14-0.48). Physicians predicted similar median probabilities of appendicitis for patients who were ultimately diagnosed with appendicitis (75% vs. 70%; p = 0.73) and patients without appendicitis (25% vs. 30%; p = 0.59). For a subset of patients given a > or = 90% predicted probability of appendicitis, pediatric EPs and senior surgical residents had similar accuracy (80% vs. 79%; p = 0.92). Similarly, among patients with < or = 10% predicted probability, pediatric EPs were correct in 95% and senior surgical residents correct in 94% of patients (p = 0.63).
Pediatric EPs and senior surgical residents elicit historical findings from patients with suspected appendicitis with a greater degree of similarity than physical examination findings, which exhibit a wide degree of variability. Pediatric EPs and senior surgical residents do not differ in their ability to clinically predict appendicitis. These findings may be helpful in developing institutional management protocols.
比较儿科急诊医生(EPs)和高级外科住院医师之间的检查者间可靠性以及预测阑尾炎的能力。
作者对3至18岁有疑似阑尾炎体征和症状的儿童进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。患者首先由一名儿科急诊主治医生进行检查,然后由一名会诊的高级外科住院医师进行检查。医生报告特定病史和体格检查结果的有无,并预测患者患阑尾炎的可能性。比较了病史和体格检查结果的检查者间可靠性(kappa统计量)。计算了儿科急诊医生和外科医生预测的阑尾炎分布及中位概率。
作者评估了350例急性腹痛患者。病史问题显示不同类型医生之间的一致性为轻微至非常好(kappa统计量范围为0.33 - 0.82),而体格检查结果的一致性为差至一般(范围为0.14 - 0.48)。对于最终被诊断为阑尾炎的患者,医生预测的阑尾炎中位概率相似(75%对70%;p = 0.73),对于未患阑尾炎的患者,预测概率也相似(25%对30%;p = 0.59)。对于预测阑尾炎概率≥90%的患者亚组,儿科急诊医生和高级外科住院医师的准确性相似(80%对79%;p = 0.92)。同样,在预测概率≤10%的患者中,儿科急诊医生对95%的患者判断正确,高级外科住院医师对94%的患者判断正确(p = 0.63)。
儿科急诊医生和高级外科住院医师从疑似阑尾炎患者中获取的病史结果比体格检查结果具有更高的相似性,体格检查结果存在很大差异。儿科急诊医生和高级外科住院医师在临床预测阑尾炎的能力上没有差异。这些发现可能有助于制定机构管理方案。