Holliman C James, Mulligan Terrence M, Suter Robert E, Cameron Peter, Wallis Lee, Anderson Philip D, Clem Kathleen
The Center for Disaster and Humanitarian Assistance Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, and George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Int J Emerg Med. 2011 Jul 22;4:44. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-4-44.
The goal of this study was to identify publications in the medical literature that support the efficacy or value of Emergency Medicine (EM) as a medical specialty and of clinical care delivered by trained emergency physicians. In this study we use the term "value" to refer both to the "efficacy of clinical care" in terms of achieving desired patient outcomes, as well as "efficiency" in terms of effective and/or cost-effective utilization of healthcare resources in delivering emergency care. A comprehensive listing of publications describing the efficacy or value of EM has not been previously published. It is anticipated that the accumulated reference list generated by this study will serve to help promote awareness of the value of EM as a medical specialty, and acceptance and development of the specialty of EM in countries where EM is new or not yet fully established.
The January 1995 to October 2010 issues of selected journals, including the EM journals with the highest article impact factors, were reviewed to identify articles of studies or commentaries that evaluated efficacy, effectiveness, and/or value related to EM as a specialty or to clinical care delivered by EM practitioners. Articles were included if they found a positive or beneficial effect of EM or of EM physician-provided medical care. Additional articles that had been published prior to 1995 or in other non-EM journals already known to the authors were also included.
A total of 282 articles were identified, and each was categorized into one of the following topics: efficacy of EM for critical care and procedures (31 articles), efficacy of EM for efficiency or cost of care (30 articles), efficacy of EM for public health or preventive medicine (34 articles), efficacy of EM for radiology (11 articles), efficacy of EM for trauma or airway management (27 articles), efficacy of EM for using ultrasound (56 articles), efficacy of EM faculty (34 articles), efficacy of EM residencies (24 articles), and overviews and editorials of EM efficacy and value (35 articles).
There is extensive medical literature that supports the efficacy and value for both EM as a medical specialty and for emergency patient care delivered by trained EM physicians.
本研究的目标是在医学文献中找出能支持急诊医学(EM)作为一门医学专业以及受过培训的急诊医师提供的临床护理的有效性或价值的出版物。在本研究中,我们使用“价值”一词既指在实现预期患者治疗效果方面的“临床护理有效性”,也指在提供急诊护理时有效和/或具有成本效益地利用医疗资源方面的“效率”。此前尚未发表过描述EM有效性或价值的出版物的综合列表。预计本研究生成的累积参考文献列表将有助于提高对EM作为一门医学专业的价值的认识,并在EM是新兴专业或尚未完全确立的国家促进对EM专业的接受和发展。
对1995年1月至2010年10月选定期刊的各期进行了审查,这些期刊包括文章影响因子最高的急诊医学期刊,以找出评估与EM作为一门专业或与EM从业者提供的临床护理相关的有效性、效果和/或价值的研究文章或评论文章。如果文章发现EM或EM医师提供的医疗护理有积极或有益的效果,则将其纳入。1995年之前发表的或作者已知的其他非急诊医学期刊上的其他文章也被纳入。
共识别出282篇文章,每篇文章被归类到以下主题之一:EM在重症监护和操作方面的有效性(31篇文章)、EM在护理效率或成本方面的有效性(30篇文章)、EM在公共卫生或预防医学方面的有效性(34篇文章)、EM在放射学方面的有效性(11篇文章)、EM在创伤或气道管理方面的有效性(27篇文章)、EM在使用超声方面的有效性(56篇文章)、EM教员的有效性(34篇文章)、EM住院医师培训的有效性(24篇文章)以及EM有效性和价值的综述与社论(35篇文章)。
有大量医学文献支持EM作为一门医学专业以及受过培训的急诊医师提供的急诊患者护理的有效性和价值。