• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项测试离子牙刷减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎功效的临床试验。

A clinical trial testing the efficacy of an ionic toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.

作者信息

Moreira Carlos Heitor Cunha, Luz Patrícia Blaya, Villarinho Eduardo Aydos, Petri Luciano Costa, Weidlich Patrícia, Rösing Cassiano Kuchenbecker

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 2007;18(4):123-5.

PMID:18277743
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess the efficacy of an ionic toothbrush on reducing plaque and gingivitis.

METHODOLOGY

Twenty first-year dental students were included in the study. Ten individuals were randomly assigned to use either an ionic or a conventional toothbrush. Two periods of 28 days each were used with each brush, with a wash-out period of 14 days. A calibrated examiner used the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (QHI) and Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) on six sites per tooth, on all teeth, both pre- and post-brushing. The examiner was unaware of the toothbrush used by the subjects. Means were calculated, and for intra and inter-group comparisons a paired sample t-test was used (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

On buccal-lingual surfaces, both toothbrushes significantly reduced plaque; there was no statistically significant difference between the two toothbrushes (1.56 and 1.52 for ionic and conventional toothbrushes, respectively). In interdental spaces, an increase of QHI was detected for both brushes, but without significant differences between them. For the GBI on buccal/lingual surfaces, no significant differences were detected between toothbrushes. The GBI did not significantly change for either toothbrush on interdental surfaces during the study period.

CONCLUSION

The ionic and the conventional toothbrushes did not present statistically significant differences on plaque and gingival bleeding reductions.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估离子牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的功效。

方法

20名一年级牙科学生参与了该研究。10人被随机分配使用离子牙刷或传统牙刷。每种牙刷各使用两个为期28天的阶段,中间有14天的洗脱期。一名经过校准的检查人员在刷牙前后,对所有牙齿的每颗牙的六个部位使用奎格利 - 海因菌斑指数(QHI)和牙龈出血指数(GBI)进行评估。检查人员不知道受试者使用的是哪种牙刷。计算平均值,并使用配对样本t检验进行组内和组间比较(α = 0.05)。

结果

在颊舌面,两种牙刷都能显著减少牙菌斑;两种牙刷之间没有统计学上的显著差异(离子牙刷和传统牙刷分别为1.56和1.52)。在牙间隙中,两种牙刷的QHI均有所增加,但两者之间没有显著差异。对于颊/舌面的GBI,两种牙刷之间未检测到显著差异。在研究期间,两种牙刷在牙间隙表面的GBI均未显著变化。

结论

离子牙刷和传统牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈出血方面没有统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

1
A clinical trial testing the efficacy of an ionic toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.一项测试离子牙刷减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎功效的临床试验。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(4):123-5.
2
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较:对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
3
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
4
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.
5
Efficacy of an ionic toothbrush on gingival crevicular fluid--a pilot study.
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2008;21(1):17-20.
6
Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.两种牙菌斑指数在评估牙刷效果中的相关性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 1;7(5):1-9.
7
The comparative plaque removal efficacy of two advanced manual toothbrush designs in two independent clinical studies.两项独立临床研究中两种先进手动牙刷设计的相对牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2001;12(3):83-6.
8
A 12-week clinical comparison of an oscillating-rotating power brush versus a marketed sonic brush with self-adjusting technology in reducing plaque and gingivitis.一项为期12周的临床比较:振荡旋转电动牙刷与一款具有自动调节技术的市售声波牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的效果。
J Clin Dent. 2013;24(2):55-61.
9
A 30-day clinical comparison of a novel interdental cleaning device and dental floss in the reduction of plaque and gingivitis.一种新型牙间隙清洁装置与牙线在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的30天临床比较。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(2):33-7.
10
Plaque removal and oral health promotion potential for the elmex interX medium toothbrush: clinical efficacy and safety evaluation.elmex interX中号牙刷的菌斑清除及口腔健康促进潜力:临床疗效与安全性评估
J Clin Dent. 2003;14(3):70-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.电动牙刷与手动牙刷对口腔健康的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3.