Hollien Harry, Harnsberger James D, Martin Camilo A, Hollien Kevin A
Institute for Advanced Study of the Communication Processes, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2008 Jan;53(1):183-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00596.x.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a commonly used voice stress analyzer, the National Institute of Truth Verification's (NITV) Computer Voice Stress Analyzer (CVSA), using a speech database containing materials recorded (i) in the laboratory, while highly controlled deceptive and shock-induced stress levels were systematically varied, and (ii) during a field procedure. Subjects were 24 each males/females (age range 18-63 years) drawn from a representative population. All held strong views on an issue and were required to make sharply derogatory statements about it. The CVSA system was then evaluated in a double-blind study using three sets of examiners: (i) two UF scientists trained/certified by NITV in CVSA operation, (ii) three experienced NITV operators provided by the manufacturer and (iii) five experimental phoneticians. The results showed that the "true positive" (or hit) rates for all examiners ranged from chance to somewhat higher levels (c. 50-65%) for all conditions and types of materials (e.g., stress vs. unstressed, truth vs. deception). However, the false-positive rate was just as high - often higher. Sensitivity statistics demonstrated that the CVSA system operated at about chance level.
本研究的目的是使用一个语音数据库对一种常用的语音压力分析仪——国家真相验证研究所(NITV)的计算机语音压力分析仪(CVSA)进行评估,该数据库包含(i)在实验室录制的材料,其中高度可控的欺骗性和震惊引发的压力水平被系统地改变,以及(ii)在一个现场程序中录制的材料。受试者为从具有代表性的人群中抽取的24名男性/女性(年龄范围18 - 63岁)。所有人对一个问题都持有强烈的观点,并被要求对该问题做出尖锐的贬损性陈述。然后,在一项双盲研究中,使用三组考官对CVSA系统进行评估:(i)两名由NITV培训并获得CVSA操作认证的佛罗里达大学科学家,(ii)制造商提供的三名经验丰富的NITV操作员,以及(iii)五名实验语音学家。结果表明,在所有条件和材料类型(例如,有压力与无压力、真实与欺骗)下,所有考官的“真阳性”(或命中)率从随机水平到略高的水平(约50 - 65%)不等。然而,假阳性率同样高——通常更高。敏感性统计表明,CVSA系统的运行处于随机水平。