Goodney Philip P, Lucas F Lee, Travis Lori L, Likosky Donald S, Malenka David J, Fisher Elliott S
Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.
Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):170-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.43.
It remains unknown if the increasing use of carotid artery stenting (CAS) has caused a change in the population-based use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We sought to examine national trends in carotid revascularization.
Retrospective cohort study.
Academic research.
All Medicare beneficiaries (MCBEs) between January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2004.
We examined the frequency of CEA and CAS using Current Procedural Terminology codes for CEA, peripheral stent insertion, and cerebrovascular disease. To exclude patients who underwent stenting of a peripheral artery other than the carotid artery, we excluded all patients with a primary diagnostic code for peripheral vascular disease.
We identified 134 194 claims for carotid revascularization (9386 claims for CAS and 124 808 claims for CEA). The overall incidence of carotid revascularization procedures decreased slightly between 1998 and 2004, from 388.1 to 345.8 procedures per 100 000 MCBEs (11% decrease, P < .02). Between 1998 and 2004, the incidence of CEA decreased from 373.4 to 309.3 procedures per 100 000 MCBEs (17% decrease, P < .01), while the incidence of CAS increased from 14.6 to 36.4 procedures per 100 000 MCBEs (149% increase, P < .01).
While rates of carotid revascularization in the Medicare population slightly decreased between 1998 and 2004, the use of CAS dramatically increased. Whether this represents a substitution of CAS for CEA vs a broadening of indications for carotid revascularization using CAS is unknown but is of interest to patients and third-party payers and requires future investigation.
颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)使用的增加是否导致了基于人群的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)使用情况的变化,目前尚不清楚。我们试图研究颈动脉血运重建的全国趋势。
回顾性队列研究。
学术研究。
1998年1月1日至2004年12月31日期间的所有医疗保险受益人(MCBE)。
我们使用CEA、外周支架置入和脑血管疾病的现行程序术语代码来检查CEA和CAS的频率。为排除接受除颈动脉以外的外周动脉支架置入术的患者,我们排除了所有主要诊断代码为外周血管疾病的患者。
我们确定了134194例颈动脉血运重建索赔(9386例CAS索赔和124808例CEA索赔)。1998年至2004年期间,颈动脉血运重建手术的总体发生率略有下降,从每100000名MCBE中的388.1例降至345.8例(下降11%,P<.02)。1998年至2004年期间,CEA的发生率从每100000名MCBE中的373.4例降至309.3例(下降17%,P<.01),而CAS的发生率从每100000名MCBE中的14.6例增至36.4例(增加149%,P<.01)。
虽然1998年至2004年期间医疗保险人群中的颈动脉血运重建率略有下降,但CAS的使用显著增加。这是代表CAS替代CEA,还是代表使用CAS扩大颈动脉血运重建的适应症,目前尚不清楚,但患者和第三方支付者对此感兴趣,需要未来进行调查。