• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险人群中颈动脉血运重建术使用情况的变化。

Changes in the use of carotid revascularization among the medicare population.

作者信息

Goodney Philip P, Lucas F Lee, Travis Lori L, Likosky Donald S, Malenka David J, Fisher Elliott S

机构信息

Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):170-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.43.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.2007.43
PMID:18283142
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

It remains unknown if the increasing use of carotid artery stenting (CAS) has caused a change in the population-based use of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We sought to examine national trends in carotid revascularization.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic research.

PATIENTS

All Medicare beneficiaries (MCBEs) between January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2004.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We examined the frequency of CEA and CAS using Current Procedural Terminology codes for CEA, peripheral stent insertion, and cerebrovascular disease. To exclude patients who underwent stenting of a peripheral artery other than the carotid artery, we excluded all patients with a primary diagnostic code for peripheral vascular disease.

RESULTS

We identified 134 194 claims for carotid revascularization (9386 claims for CAS and 124 808 claims for CEA). The overall incidence of carotid revascularization procedures decreased slightly between 1998 and 2004, from 388.1 to 345.8 procedures per 100 000 MCBEs (11% decrease, P < .02). Between 1998 and 2004, the incidence of CEA decreased from 373.4 to 309.3 procedures per 100 000 MCBEs (17% decrease, P < .01), while the incidence of CAS increased from 14.6 to 36.4 procedures per 100 000 MCBEs (149% increase, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

While rates of carotid revascularization in the Medicare population slightly decreased between 1998 and 2004, the use of CAS dramatically increased. Whether this represents a substitution of CAS for CEA vs a broadening of indications for carotid revascularization using CAS is unknown but is of interest to patients and third-party payers and requires future investigation.

摘要

假设

颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)使用的增加是否导致了基于人群的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)使用情况的变化,目前尚不清楚。我们试图研究颈动脉血运重建的全国趋势。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

学术研究。

患者

1998年1月1日至2004年12月31日期间的所有医疗保险受益人(MCBE)。

主要观察指标

我们使用CEA、外周支架置入和脑血管疾病的现行程序术语代码来检查CEA和CAS的频率。为排除接受除颈动脉以外的外周动脉支架置入术的患者,我们排除了所有主要诊断代码为外周血管疾病的患者。

结果

我们确定了134194例颈动脉血运重建索赔(9386例CAS索赔和124808例CEA索赔)。1998年至2004年期间,颈动脉血运重建手术的总体发生率略有下降,从每100000名MCBE中的388.1例降至345.8例(下降11%,P<.02)。1998年至2004年期间,CEA的发生率从每100000名MCBE中的373.4例降至309.3例(下降17%,P<.01),而CAS的发生率从每100000名MCBE中的14.6例增至36.4例(增加149%,P<.01)。

结论

虽然1998年至2004年期间医疗保险人群中的颈动脉血运重建率略有下降,但CAS的使用显著增加。这是代表CAS替代CEA,还是代表使用CAS扩大颈动脉血运重建的适应症,目前尚不清楚,但患者和第三方支付者对此感兴趣,需要未来进行调查。

相似文献

1
Changes in the use of carotid revascularization among the medicare population.医疗保险人群中颈动脉血运重建术使用情况的变化。
Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):170-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.43.
2
Trends and outcomes of concurrent carotid revascularization and coronary bypass.同期颈动脉血管重建术与冠状动脉搭桥术的趋势及结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Aug;48(2):355-360; discussion 360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.03.031. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
3
Surgeon case volume and 30-day mortality after carotid endarterectomy among contemporary medicare beneficiaries: before and after national coverage determination for carotid artery stenting.当代医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉内膜切除术后外科医生的手术量与30天死亡率:在国家确定颈动脉支架置入术覆盖范围之前和之后
Stroke. 2015 May;46(5):1288-94. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006276. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
4
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国,颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.
5
Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients.医师专业与为医疗保险患者选择的颈动脉血运重建技术的差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.068. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.在美国2005年,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术增加了术后中风、死亡及资源利用的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
7
Geographic variation in carotid revascularization among Medicare beneficiaries, 2003-2006.2003 - 2006年医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉血运重建的地域差异
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jul 26;170(14):1218-25. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.194.
8
Analysis of Florida and New York state hospital discharges suggests that carotid stenting in symptomatic women is associated with significant increase in mortality and perioperative morbidity compared with carotid endarterectomy.对佛罗里达州和纽约州医院出院患者的分析表明,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,症状性女性颈动脉支架置入术与死亡率和围手术期发病率显著增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.066. Epub 2012 May 12.
9
Association between Medicare high-risk criteria and outcomes after carotid revascularization procedures.医疗保险高风险标准与颈动脉血运重建术后结局的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jun;67(6):1752-1761.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.066. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
Readmissions after carotid artery revascularization in the Medicare population.医疗保险人群中颈动脉血管重建术后的再入院情况。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 14;65(14):1398-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.048.

引用本文的文献

1
Asymptomatic Females Are at Higher Risk for Perioperative TIA/Stroke and Males Are at Higher Risk for Long-Term Mortality after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Vascular Quality Initiative Analysis.无症状女性在颈动脉支架置入术后围手术期发生短暂性脑缺血发作/中风的风险更高,而男性在术后长期死亡风险更高:一项血管质量改进计划分析。
Int J Angiol. 2020 Sep 16;33(1):36-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712506. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Safety of the transradial approach to carotid stenting.经桡动脉途径行颈动脉支架置入术的安全性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):814-821. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29912. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
3
National practice trends for the surgical management of lung cancer in the CMS population: an atlas of care.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)人群中肺癌手术管理的全国实践趋势:护理图谱
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(Suppl 4):S500-S508. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.05.
4
Validating Publicly Available Crosswalks for Translating ICD-9 to ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research.验证用于心血管疾病结局研究的将ICD - 9转换为ICD - 10诊断代码的公开可用交叉对照表
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Oct;11(10):e004782. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004782.
5
National Trends and Geographic Variation in Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Use in the United States.美国双侧乳内动脉使用情况的全国趋势及地理差异
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Dec;104(6):1902-1907. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.08.055. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
6
De-adoption and exnovation in the use of carotid revascularization: retrospective cohort study.颈动脉血管重建术应用中的弃用与革新:回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Oct 26;359:j4695. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4695.
7
Impact of Clinical Trial Results on the Temporal Trends of Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting From 2002 to 2014.2002年至2014年临床试验结果对颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术时间趋势的影响
Stroke. 2016 Dec;47(12):2923-2930. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014856. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients.医师专业与为医疗保险患者选择的颈动脉血运重建技术的差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.068. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
9
Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《卒中一级预防指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会给医疗保健专业人员的声明》
Stroke. 2014 Dec;45(12):3754-832. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000046. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
10
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2013年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):e6-e245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad. Epub 2012 Dec 12.