Jenkins J R, Jewell M, Leicester N, Jenkins L, Troutner N M
University of Minnesota.
J Learn Disabil. 1991 May;24(5):311-20. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400508.
This study, conducted in the context of a 4-year project to redesign special and remedial services in an elementary school, examined the effects of cooperative learning, cross-age tutoring, and in-class services for students with handicaps and remedial students. All students (524) in Grades 1 through 6 in two medium-sized elementary schools took part in the study. All three treatments were introduced into one of the schools, with the second school serving as a control. The cooperative learning treatment was delivered to all sixth-grade students, cross-age tutoring to special and remedial students in Grades 1 through 3, and the in-class services to all grade levels. Results indicated that, although the character of the instructional services changed markedly, none of the three treatments had much impact on achievement. Reasons for the findings are explored.
本研究是在一个为期四年的项目背景下进行的,该项目旨在重新设计一所小学的特殊教育和辅导服务,研究了合作学习、跨年龄辅导以及为残疾学生和辅导学生提供的课堂服务的效果。两所中等规模小学的一至六年级全体学生(共524名)参与了该研究。三种干预措施都在其中一所学校实施,另一所学校作为对照。合作学习干预措施针对所有六年级学生,跨年龄辅导针对一至三年级的特殊教育学生和辅导学生,课堂服务则面向所有年级。结果表明,尽管教学服务的性质发生了显著变化,但这三种干预措施对学业成绩均未产生太大影响。本文探讨了这些研究结果的原因。