Suppr超能文献

结直肠癌中的个体和试验水平替代指标

Individual- and trial-level surrogacy in colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Buyse Marc, Burzykowski Tomasz, Michiels Stefan, Carroll Kevin

机构信息

IDDI (International Drug Development Institute), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium and Center for Statistics, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Oct;17(5):467-75. doi: 10.1177/0962280207081864. Epub 2008 Feb 19.

Abstract

Two conditions must be fulfilled for an intermediate endpoint to be an acceptable surrogate for a true clinical endpoint: (1) there must be a strong association between the surrogate and the true endpoint, and (2) there must be a strong association between the effects of treatment on the surrogate and the true endpoint. We test whether these conditions are fulfilled for disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) on data from 20 clinical trials comparing experimental treatments with standard treatments for early and advanced colorectal cancer. The effects of treatment on DFS (or PFS in advanced disease) and OS were quantified through log hazard ratios (log HR), estimated through a Weibull model stratified for trial. The rank correlation coefficients between DFS and OS, and trial-specific treatment effects, were estimated using a bivariate copula distribution for these endpoints. A linear regression model between the estimated log hazard ratios was used to compute the "surrogate threshold effect", which is the minimum treatment effect on DFS required to predict a non-zero treatment effect on OS in a future trial. In early disease, the rank correlation coefficient between DFS and OS was equal to 0.96 (CI 0.95-0.97). The correlation coefficient between the log hazard ratios was equal to 0.94 (CI 0.87-1.01). The risk reductions were approximately 3% smaller on OS than on DFS, and the surrogate threshold effect corresponded to a DFS hazard ratio of 0.93. In advanced disease, the rank correlation coefficient between PFS and OS was equal to 0.82 (CI 0.82-0.83). The correlation coefficient between the log hazard ratios was equal to 0.99 (CI 0.94-1.04). The risk reductions were approximately 19% smaller on OS than on PFS, and the surrogate threshold effect corresponded to a PFS hazard ratio of 0.86. One trial with a large treatment effect on PFS and OS had a strong influence on the results in advanced disease. DFS (and PFS in advanced disease) are acceptable surrogates for OS in colorectal cancer.

摘要

中间终点要成为真实临床终点可接受的替代指标,必须满足两个条件:(1)替代指标与真实终点之间必须有强关联;(2)治疗对替代指标的效应与真实终点之间必须有强关联。我们利用来自20项临床试验的数据,检验无病生存期(DFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)是否满足这些条件,这些试验比较了早期和晚期结直肠癌的实验性治疗与标准治疗。通过对数风险比(log HR)对治疗对DFS(或晚期疾病中的PFS)和总生存期(OS)的效应进行量化,通过针对试验分层的威布尔模型进行估计。使用这些终点的二元copula分布估计DFS与OS之间的秩相关系数以及特定试验的治疗效应。利用估计的对数风险比之间的线性回归模型计算“替代阈值效应”,即未来试验中预测对OS有非零治疗效应所需的对DFS的最小治疗效应。在早期疾病中,DFS与OS之间的秩相关系数等于0.96(95%CI:0.95 - 0.97)。对数风险比之间的相关系数等于0.94(95%CI:0.87 - 1.01)。OS的风险降低比DFS约小3%,替代阈值效应对应的DFS风险比为0.93。在晚期疾病中,PFS与OS之间的秩相关系数等于0.82(95%CI:0.82 - 0.83)。对数风险比之间的相关系数等于0.99(95%CI:0.94 - 1.04)。OS的风险降低比PFS约小19%,替代阈值效应对应的PFS风险比为0.86。一项对PFS和OS有大治疗效应的试验对晚期疾病的结果有很大影响。在结直肠癌中,DFS(以及晚期疾病中的PFS)是OS可接受的替代指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验