Barrail-Tran Aurélie, Morand-Joubert Laurence, Poizat Gwendoline, Raguin Gilles, Le Tiec Clotilde, Clavel François, Dam Elisabeth, Chêne Geneviève, Girard Pierre-Marie, Taburet Anne-Marie
Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Paris, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 May;52(5):1642-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01314-07. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
The inhibitory quotient (IQ) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs), which is the ratio of drug concentration to viral susceptibility, is considered to be predictive of the virological response. We used several approaches to calculate the IQs of amprenavir and lopinavir in a subset of heavily pretreated patients participating in the French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS) 104 trial and then compared their potentials for predicting changes in the plasma HIV RNA level. Thirty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive either amprenavir (600 mg twice a day [BID]) or lopinavir (400 mg BID) plus ritonavir (100 or 200 mg BID) for 2 weeks before combining the two PIs. The 90% inhibitory concentration (IC(90)) was measured using a recombinant assay without or with additional human serum (IC(90+serum)). Total and unbound PI concentrations in plasma were measured. Univariate linear regression was used to estimate the relation between the change in viral load and the IC(90) or IQ values. The amprenavir phenotypic IQ values were very similar when measured with the standard and protein binding-adjusted IC(90)s. No relationship was found between the viral load decline and the lopinavir IQ. During combination therapy, the amprenavir and lopinavir genotypic IQ values were predictive of the viral response at week 6 (P = 0.03). The number of protease mutations (< 5 or > or = 5) was related to the virological response throughout the study. These findings suggest that the combined genotypic IQ and the number of protease mutations are the best predictors of virological response. High amprenavir and lopinavir concentrations in these patients might explain why plasma concentrations and the phenotypic IQ have poor predictive value.
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)的抑制商(IQ),即药物浓度与病毒易感性的比值,被认为可预测病毒学反应。我们采用多种方法计算了参与法国国家艾滋病研究机构(ANRS)104试验的部分经大量治疗患者中安普那韦和洛匹那韦的IQ,然后比较了它们预测血浆HIV RNA水平变化的潜力。37名患者被随机分配接受安普那韦(每日两次,每次600 mg)或洛匹那韦(每日两次,每次400 mg)加利托那韦(每日两次,每次100或200 mg)治疗2周,之后联合使用这两种蛋白酶抑制剂。使用重组试验在无或有额外人血清的情况下测量90%抑制浓度(IC(90))(IC(90+血清))。测量血浆中总蛋白酶抑制剂浓度和游离蛋白酶抑制剂浓度。采用单变量线性回归估计病毒载量变化与IC(90)或IQ值之间的关系。用标准IC(90)和经蛋白结合调整的IC(90)测量时,安普那韦的表型IQ值非常相似。未发现病毒载量下降与洛匹那韦IQ之间存在关联。在联合治疗期间,安普那韦和洛匹那韦的基因型IQ值可预测第6周的病毒反应(P = 0.0