Stebbing Justin, Wood Christopher, Atkins Michael, Bukowski Ronald, Litwin Stephen, Bower Mark, Parsa Andrew, Levitsky Hyam
Imperial College School of Science, Medicine, and Technology, The Hammersmith Hospitals National Health Service Trust, London, UK.
Cancer. 2008 Mar 1;112(5):955-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23273.
The challenges of late-stage development increasingly are becoming clear as the clinical development of therapeutic cancer vaccines continues to progress. Preclinical and clinical research had indicated that cancer vaccines exert optimal benefit in earlier stage disease or in adjuvant/minimal residual disease (MRD) settings. However, clinical trials in these settings can be prohibitively slow from a development perspective because of the better prognosis of the patient population and the current lack of early surrogate markers of efficacy. Therefore, the 'optimal' patient population (the patient group in which the greatest benefit is demonstrated) for any given vaccine studied in this setting generally must be identified first through the conduct of a large randomized trial for each indication, then confirmed in a second large randomized trial. On the basis of the current regulatory paradigm, a late-stage development program for a cancer vaccine in the earlier stage disease or adjuvant/MRD setting easily could extend past 10 years. The tight funding environment and constant evolution in medical practice, which can make replication of results from the first trial infeasible over such a long timeline, pose additional challenges. In this report, the authors discuss 3 potential regulatory solutions to better enable the development and commercialization of therapeutic cancer vaccines: a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-proposed cost-recovery program, conditional marketing authorization, and a new development paradigm. All of these solutions aim to balance a complex equation of biologic rationale, weight of the evidence for efficacy and safety, regulatory expectations, and cost and timeline of clinical development.
随着治疗性癌症疫苗的临床开发不断推进,后期开发面临的挑战日益清晰。临床前和临床研究表明,癌症疫苗在疾病早期阶段或辅助/微小残留病(MRD)环境中能发挥最佳效益。然而,从开发角度来看,由于患者群体预后较好且目前缺乏早期疗效替代标志物,这些环境下的临床试验可能会极其缓慢。因此,在这种情况下研究的任何给定疫苗的“最佳”患者群体(即显示出最大效益的患者组)通常必须首先通过针对每个适应症进行大型随机试验来确定,然后在第二项大型随机试验中得到证实。根据当前的监管模式,癌症疫苗在疾病早期阶段或辅助/MRD环境下的后期开发计划很容易超过10年。资金紧张的环境以及医学实践的不断演变,使得在如此长的时间内复制第一项试验的结果变得不可行,这带来了额外的挑战。在本报告中,作者讨论了3种潜在的监管解决方案,以更好地推动治疗性癌症疫苗的开发和商业化:美国食品药品监督管理局提议的成本回收计划、有条件上市许可和一种新的开发模式。所有这些解决方案旨在平衡生物学原理、疗效和安全性证据的权重、监管期望以及临床开发的成本和时间表这一复杂等式。