Hesaraki S, Zamanian A, Moztarzadeh F
Ceramics Department, Materials and Energy Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Feb;88(2):314-21. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31836.
Sodium hexametaphosphate (Na-HMP) is a common liquefying agent widely used in the ceramics industry for modifying the rheological behavior of ceramic slurries. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of Na-HMP on several properties of calcium phosphate cements (CPCs). Various types of CPCs were prepared by mixing the same powder, namely, a mixture of tetracalcium phosphate and dicalcium phosphate anhydrate, with various liquids, namely, distilled water, Na(2)HPO(4) solutions, and Na-HMP solutions. The setting time, mechanical strength, rheological properties, and injectability of the cement pastes were examined in this work. Also, X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques were employed for phase analysis and morphological evaluations, respectively. The results showed that, compared to CPCs made with water and Na(2)HPO(4) solutions, the CPC pastes made with Na-HMP solutions had improved stability and injectability but prolonged setting times. The XRD and SEM studies showed that Na-HMP inhibited the growth of apatite crystals during soaking of the cements in Ringer's solution. Thus, the CPC made with Na-HMP solution had lower compressive strength than those made with water or Na(2)HPO(4) solutions. Although Na-HMP could improve the injectability and stability of the CPC paste, it impaired other basic properties of the cement. Thus, it is not an appropriate liquefier additive.
六偏磷酸钠(Na-HMP)是一种常用的液化剂,在陶瓷工业中广泛用于改变陶瓷浆料的流变行为。本研究的目的是探讨Na-HMP对磷酸钙骨水泥(CPC)几种性能的影响。通过将相同的粉末(即磷酸四钙和无水磷酸二钙的混合物)与不同的液体(即蒸馏水、Na₂HPO₄溶液和Na-HMP溶液)混合,制备了各种类型的CPC。在本研究中,对水泥浆体的凝结时间、机械强度、流变性能和可注射性进行了检测。此外,分别采用X射线衍射(XRD)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)技术进行相分析和形态评估。结果表明,与用水和Na₂HPO₄溶液制成的CPC相比,用Na-HMP溶液制成的CPC浆体具有更好的稳定性和可注射性,但凝结时间延长。XRD和SEM研究表明,Na-HMP在水泥在林格氏溶液中浸泡期间抑制了磷灰石晶体的生长。因此,用Na-HMP溶液制成的CPC的抗压强度低于用水或Na₂HPO₄溶液制成的CPC。尽管Na-HMP可以改善CPC浆体的可注射性和稳定性,但它损害了水泥的其他基本性能。因此,它不是一种合适的液化剂添加剂。