Dovey S M, Tilyard M W
Department of General Practice, Otago Medical School, Dunedin.
N Z Med J. 1991 Jun 12;104(913):222-4.
information generated by the computer systems of thirty-five general practitioners was examined to determine their fee structure during the study period.
copies of the general medical services (GMS) claims and patient fees were examined to determine whether patients had been charged the doctor's regular fee or an amount greater or less than this.
information on 97,869 consultations was collected. A regular fee was charged to patients in 47% of cases, a greater or less than normal fee was charged in 7.5% of the consultations, and no fee to the patient was made in 22.5% of cases. Consultations charged to the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) comprised 17.5% of the study data. Maternity cases comprised the remaining 5.5%. Nineteen doctors provided information on 6511 out of hours or home visit consultations. In 44.3% of these cases no charge was made to the patient. This proportion was higher among beneficiaries (58.9%) than for any other group.
all of the contributing doctors appear to exercise discretion in their charging policies rather than to maintain a rigid pricing structure for their services.
对35名全科医生计算机系统生成的信息进行检查,以确定他们在研究期间的收费结构。
检查一般医疗服务(GMS)索赔单副本和患者费用,以确定患者支付的是医生的常规费用,还是高于或低于该费用的金额。
收集了97869次会诊的信息。47%的病例向患者收取了常规费用,7.5%的会诊收取了高于或低于正常水平的费用,22.5%的病例未向患者收费。向事故赔偿公司(ACC)收取费用的会诊占研究数据的17.5%。产科病例占其余的5.5%。19名医生提供了6511次非工作时间或上门会诊的信息。在其中44.3%的病例中,未向患者收费。这一比例在受益人中(58.9%)高于其他任何群体。
所有参与的医生似乎在收费政策上都行使了自由裁量权,而不是对其服务维持严格的定价结构。