Suppr超能文献

静脉小动脉反射受损可能是硝苯地平引起踝部水肿的一个原因。

Impaired venoarteriolar reflex as a possible cause for nifedipine-induced ankle oedema.

作者信息

Salmasi A M, Belcaro G, Nicolaides A N

机构信息

Irvine Laboratory for Cardiovascular Investigation and Research, St. Mary's Hospital, London, U.K.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 1991 Mar;30(3):303-7. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(91)90007-c.

Abstract

Ankle oedema is not an uncommon side effect of treatment with nifedipine. To evaluate the possible effect of nifedipine on the microcirculation of the skin, 18 patients with systemic hypertension who were known to develop ankle oedema after nifedipine and 19 patients with systemic hypertension who did not develop ankle oedema after nifedipine were studied. Following four weeks of nifedipine therapy (10 mg, three times daily), the microcirculation on the dorsum of the foot was measured using laser-Doppler flowmetry. Estimation of the microcapillary flow was made both after supine resting and on standing upright. The venoarteriolar reflex was expressed as the standing flow in percentage of the resting flow. There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients in the resting flow, supine flow, or the venoarteriolar reflex before nifedipine therapy (P greater than 0.4). Before nifedipine, the blood blow in the skin of both groups of patients was reduced from the supine level upon standing, thus indicating a normal response to dependency. After nifedipine administration, no significant difference was observed between the two groups of patients in the resting flow (P greater than 0.5). The flow on standing, however, was 96.2% of that measured during resting supine in patients who developed ankle oedema and 79.8% of the resting flow in the patients who did not develop ankle oedema, suggesting a weaker venoarteriolar reflex in patients who developed ankle oedema following administration of nifedipine (P less than 0.0001). Thus, the microcapillary flow did not decrease upon standing in patients who developed ankle oedema following nifedipine therapy, indicating an abnormal venoarteriolar reflex. This may explain why ankle oedema develops in such patients following nifedipine.

摘要

踝部水肿是硝苯地平治疗的一种常见副作用。为评估硝苯地平对皮肤微循环的可能影响,对18例已知在服用硝苯地平后出现踝部水肿的系统性高血压患者和19例服用硝苯地平后未出现踝部水肿的系统性高血压患者进行了研究。在接受四周硝苯地平治疗(10毫克,每日三次)后,使用激光多普勒血流仪测量足部背侧的微循环。分别在仰卧休息和直立站立后对微毛细血管血流进行评估。静脉动脉反射以站立血流占休息血流的百分比表示。在硝苯地平治疗前,两组患者在休息血流、仰卧血流或静脉动脉反射方面无显著差异(P大于0.4)。在硝苯地平治疗前,两组患者站立时皮肤血流均从仰卧水平降低,这表明对体位改变的反应正常。服用硝苯地平后,两组患者在休息血流方面无显著差异(P大于0.5)。然而,出现踝部水肿的患者站立时的血流为仰卧休息时测量值的96.2%,未出现踝部水肿的患者站立时的血流为休息血流的79.8%,这表明服用硝苯地平后出现踝部水肿的患者静脉动脉反射较弱(P小于0.0001)。因此,硝苯地平治疗后出现踝部水肿的患者站立时微毛细血管血流未减少,表明静脉动脉反射异常。这可能解释了此类患者服用硝苯地平后为何会出现踝部水肿。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验