Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与开放网片修补术:一项随机对照试验的长期随访

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Hallén Magnus, Bergenfelz Anders, Westerdahl Johan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Surgery. 2008 Mar;143(3):313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.028. Epub 2008 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We have conducted a randomized controlled trial of totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) versus tension-free open repair (Lichtenstein repair); we have presented the results previously up to 1 year after the operation. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcome in both groups at a median follow-up of 7.3 years after operation.

METHODS

Of 168 patients included in a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare TEP with an open tension-free technique, 154 patients (92%) answered a questionnaire and 147 patients (88%) were followed up at an outpatient clinic after a minimum of 6 years after operation.

RESULTS

Overall, 89% of patients in the TEP group and 95% of patients in the open group reported complete long-term recovery (P = .23). Permanent impaired inguinal sensibility was more common in the open group (P = .004), whereas the proportion of patients with reported testicular pain was higher in the TEP group (P = .003). Three recurrences were found in the TEP group, and 4 recurrences were found in the open group (P = .99). Four patients in the TEP group underwent operations for complications related to the hernia repair (small bowel obstruction, umbilical hernia, testicular pain, and neuralgia).

CONCLUSION

Overall, both groups showed good long-term results with low rates of recurrences. However, the TEP group was associated with a higher proportion of patients with long-term testicular pain, whereas impaired inguinal sensibility was more common in the open group.

摘要

背景

我们进行了一项完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)与无张力开放修补术(Lichtenstein修补术)的随机对照试验;我们之前已经公布了术后1年的结果。本研究的目的是比较两组患者术后中位随访7.3年时的结局。

方法

在一项旨在比较TEP与开放无张力技术的前瞻性随机对照试验中纳入的168例患者中,154例患者(92%)回答了问卷,147例患者(88%)在术后至少6年在门诊接受了随访。

结果

总体而言,TEP组89%的患者和开放组95%的患者报告完全长期康复(P = 0.23)。开放组永久性腹股沟感觉障碍更为常见(P = 0.004),而TEP组报告有睾丸疼痛的患者比例更高(P = 0.003)。TEP组发现3例复发,开放组发现4例复发(P = 0.99)。TEP组有4例患者因与疝修补相关的并发症(小肠梗阻、脐疝、睾丸疼痛和神经痛)接受了手术。

结论

总体而言,两组均显示出良好的长期结果,复发率较低。然而,TEP组长期睾丸疼痛的患者比例较高,而开放组腹股沟感觉障碍更为常见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验