Vallely Michael P, Potger Kieron, McMillan Darryl, Hemli Jonathan M, Brady Peter W, Brereton R John L, Marshman David, Mathur Manu N, Ross Donald E
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2008 Aug;17(4):299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2007.11.138. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
Stroke remains one of the most devastating complications of cardiac surgery. Advocates of off-pump coronary revascularisation (OPCAB) maintain that post-operative neurologic morbidity is reduced by avoiding aortic cannulation and cross-clamping, and by eliminating the systemic effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. We sought to determine whether completing off-pump coronary surgery without any aortic manipulation ("anaortic" technique) afforded any additional neurological protection, as compared to off-pump grafting in which the aorta was utilised for graft inflow.
A comprehensive review of prospectively collected data was undertaken of all patients undergoing OPCAB in our institution between January 2002 and December 2006. Cases requiring intra-operative conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass were excluded from further analysis. Patients having OPCAB surgery with aortic manipulation were compared to those having OPCAB surgery without aortic manipulation. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify possible predictors of post-operative neurologic morbidity, with particular focus on the role of aortic manipulation.
During the period of review, 1758 patients underwent OPCAB, of which 1201 (68.3%) were completed without aortic manipulation, constituting the "anaortic" cohort. This group was compared with the remaining 557 patients, which included fashioning at least one aorto-conduit anastomosis, utilising either a side-biting aortic clamp or a no-clamp proximal anastomotic device. The two groups of patients were well-matched with respect to risk factors for adverse neurologic outcomes. Nine patients sustained focal neurological deficits (transient or permanent) in the peri-operative period, constituting a stroke rate of 0.51% for the entire series. The incidence of peri-operative neurological deficit in the anaortic group was 0.25% compared with 1.1% in the aortic manipulation group (odds ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.92, p=0.037). Advanced age was also associated with peri-operative neurological injury (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.20, p=0.017).
Off-pump coronary artery surgery is associated with a low incidence of peri-operative stroke. Completing the surgical procedure without manipulating the ascending aorta in any way ("anaortic" technique) offers additional neurological protection and should be the goal in all suitable off-pump coronary cases.
中风仍然是心脏手术最具破坏性的并发症之一。非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)的支持者认为,通过避免主动脉插管和阻断,以及消除体外循环的全身影响,可降低术后神经并发症的发生率。我们试图确定,与利用主动脉进行移植物流入的非体外循环搭桥术相比,完全不进行任何主动脉操作的非体外循环冠状动脉手术(“无主动脉”技术)是否能提供额外的神经保护。
对2002年1月至2006年12月期间在我院接受OPCAB的所有患者的前瞻性收集数据进行全面回顾。术中需要转为体外循环的病例被排除在进一步分析之外。将进行主动脉操作的OPCAB手术患者与未进行主动脉操作的患者进行比较。采用多因素逻辑回归分析确定术后神经并发症的可能预测因素,特别关注主动脉操作所起的作用。
在回顾期间,1758例患者接受了OPCAB手术,其中1201例(68.3%)在未进行主动脉操作的情况下完成,构成“无主动脉”队列。该组与其余557例患者进行比较,后者包括制作至少一个主动脉-移植物吻合口,使用侧咬式主动脉夹或无夹近端吻合装置。两组患者在不良神经结局的危险因素方面匹配良好。9例患者在围手术期出现局灶性神经功能缺损(短暂性或永久性),整个系列的中风发生率为0.51%。无主动脉组围手术期神经功能缺损的发生率为0.25%,而主动脉操作组为1.1%(优势比(OR)0.23,95%置信区间(CI)0.06 - 0.92,p = 0.037)。高龄也与围手术期神经损伤相关(OR 1.1,95% CI 1.01 - 1.20,p = 0.017)。
非体外循环冠状动脉手术围手术期中风发生率较低。以任何方式不操作升主动脉完成手术过程(“无主动脉”技术)可提供额外的神经保护,应成为所有合适的非体外循环冠状动脉病例的目标。