Bussmann Johannes B, Schrauwen Hannelore J, Stam Henk J
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):430-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.012.
To test the hypothesis that people with a unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation are less active than people without an amputation, and to explore whether both groups have a similar heart rate response while walking.
A case-comparison study.
General community.
Nine subjects with a unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation and 9 matched subjects without known impairments.
Not applicable.
Percentage of dynamic activities in 48 hours (expressing activity level). Additionally, we examined heart rate and percentage heart rate reserve during walking (expressing heart rate response) and body motility during walking (expressing walking speed). These parameters were objectively measured at participants' homes on 2 consecutive days.
Subjects with an amputation showed a lower percentage of dynamic activities (6.0% vs 11.7% in a 48-h period, P=.02). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in heart rate (91.1 bpm vs 89.5 bpm, P=.86) and percentage heart rate reserve during walking (28.2% vs 27.5%, P=1.0). Body motility during walking was lower in the amputation group (.14 g vs .18 g, P<.01).
Our results support our hypothesis that persons with a unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation are considerably less active than persons without known impairments. The results indicate that heart rate response during walking is similar in both groups, and is probably regulated by adapting one's walking speed.
检验单侧创伤性胫部截肢患者比非截肢患者活动量少这一假设,并探讨两组在行走时心率反应是否相似。
病例对照研究。
普通社区。
9名单侧创伤性胫部截肢患者和9名无已知损伤的匹配对照者。
不适用。
48小时内动态活动的百分比(表示活动水平)。此外,我们还检测了行走时的心率和心率储备百分比(表示心率反应)以及行走时的身体运动能力(表示行走速度)。这些参数在参与者家中连续两天进行客观测量。
截肢患者的动态活动百分比更低(48小时内分别为6.0%和11.7%,P = 0.02)。两组在心率(91.1次/分钟对89.5次/分钟,P = 0.86)和行走时的心率储备百分比(28.2%对27.5%,P = 1.0)方面无显著差异。截肢组行走时的身体运动能力更低(0.14g对0.18g,P < 0.01)。
我们的结果支持我们的假设,即单侧创伤性胫部截肢患者的活动量比无已知损伤者少得多。结果表明两组在行走时的心率反应相似,可能通过调整行走速度来调节。