Miller Matthew J, Blankenship Jennifer M, Kline Paul W, Melanson Edward L, Christiansen Cory L
Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Phys Ther. 2021 Feb 4;101(2). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa212.
The objectives of this study were to describe sitting, standing, and stepping patterns for people with lower limb amputation (LLA) and to compare sitting, standing, and stepping between people with dysvascular LLA and people with traumatic LLA.
Participants with dysvascular or traumatic LLA were included if their most recent LLA was at least 1 year earlier, they were ambulating independently with a prosthesis, and they were between 45 and 88 years old. Sitting, standing, and stepping were measured using accelerometry. Daily sitting, standing, and stepping times were expressed as percentages of waking time. Time spent in bouts of specified durations of sitting (<30, 30-60, 60-90, and >90 minutes), standing (0-1, 1-5, and >5 minutes), and stepping (0-1, 1-5, and >5 minutes) was also calculated.
Participants (N = 32; mean age = 62.6 [SD = 7.8] years; 84% men; 53% with dysvascular LLA) spent most of the day sitting (median = 77% [quartile 1 {Q1}-quartile 3 {Q3} = 67%-84%]), followed by standing (median = 16% [Q1-Q3 = 12%-27%]) and stepping (median = 6% [Q1-Q3 = 4%-9%]). One-quarter (median = 25% [Q1-Q3 = 16%-38%]) of sitting was accumulated in bouts of >90 minutes, and most standing and stepping was accrued in bouts of <1 minute (standing: median = 42% [Q1-Q3 = 34%-54%]; stepping: median = 98% [Q1-Q3 = 95%-99%]). Between-etiology differences included proportion of time sitting (traumatic: median = 70% [Q1-Q3 = 59%-78%]; dysvascular: median = 79% [Q1-Q3 = 73%-86%]) and standing (traumatic: median = 23% [Q1-Q3 = 16%-32%]; dysvascular: median = 15% [Q1-Q3 = 11%-20%]).
Participants had high daily volumes of long durations of sitting. Further, these individuals accumulated most physical activity in bouts of <1 minute.
High levels of sedentary behavior and physical inactivity patterns may place people with LLA at greater mortality risk relative to the general population. Interventions to minimize sedentary behaviors and increase physical activity are potential strategies for improving poor outcomes of physical therapy after LLA.
本研究的目的是描述下肢截肢(LLA)患者的坐姿、站姿和步姿,并比较血管性LLA患者和创伤性LLA患者的坐姿、站姿和步姿。
纳入血管性或创伤性LLA患者,条件为其最近一次LLA至少在1年前,他们使用假肢独立行走,且年龄在45至88岁之间。使用加速度计测量坐姿、站姿和步姿。每日坐姿、站姿和步姿时间以清醒时间的百分比表示。还计算了特定持续时间的坐姿(<30、30 - 60、60 - 90和>90分钟)、站姿(0 - 1、1 - 5和>5分钟)和步姿(0 - 1、1 - 5和>5分钟)的累计时间。
参与者(N = 32;平均年龄 = 62.6 [标准差 = 7.8]岁;84%为男性;53%为血管性LLA患者)一天中大部分时间都在坐着(中位数 = 77% [四分位数1{Q1}-四分位数3{Q3}=67%-84%]),其次是站立(中位数 = 16% [Q1 - Q3 = 12%-27%])和行走(中位数 = 6% [Q1 - Q3 = 4%-9%])。四分之一的坐姿(中位数 = 25% [Q1 - Q3 = 16%-38%])是在持续时间>90分钟的时段内积累的,而大部分站立和行走时间是在持续时间<1分钟的时段内积累的(站立:中位数 = 42% [Q1 - Q3 = 34%-54%];行走:中位数 = 98% [Q1 - Q3 = 95%-99%])。病因之间的差异包括坐姿时间比例(创伤性:中位数 = 70% [Q1 - Q3 = 59%-78%];血管性:中位数 = 79% [Q1 - Q3 = 73%-86%])和站姿时间比例(创伤性:中位数 = 23% [Q1 - Q3 = 16%-32%];血管性:中位数 = 15% [Q1 - Q3 = 11%-20%])。
参与者每日长时间坐着的时间较多。此外,这些个体大部分身体活动是在<1分钟的时段内积累的。
高水平的久坐行为和缺乏身体活动模式可能使LLA患者相对于一般人群面临更高的死亡风险。减少久坐行为和增加身体活动的干预措施是改善LLA后物理治疗不良结果的潜在策略。