• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估步行、跳绳、跑步、滑行和单脚跳时计步器的准确性。

Assessing pedometer accuracy while walking, skipping, galloping, sliding, and hopping.

作者信息

Smith John Damien, Schroeder Cynthia Ann

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):276-82. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f2f42.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f2f42
PMID:18296987
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the pedometer when walking, skipping, galloping, sliding, and hopping. One hundred-two college students were fitted with a pedometer (Walk4Life LS-7010) at mid-thigh on the right and left of the hip. Participants then performed the randomly assigned movements for the length (26 m) of a hardwood court playing surface, during which time the investigator tallied the steps with a hand counter. Each step with the lead foot elicited a tally on the counter. Participants were instructed to perform the movement at a brisk pace, to jump-stop at the end of the court, and to remain still until after the pedometer reading was recorded. Repeated measure ANOVAs using the Bonferroni technique were used to compare differences between pedometer counts and hand counts. Significant differences were evident between the hand tally counts and readings from the right and left pedometers during all five locomotor movements (P < .01). Mean error was lowest between the hand tally and the average of the right and left pedometers while walking (-1.35 +/- 1.60) and hopping (-2.94 +/- 2.33), and increased while sliding (-6.42 +/- 4.78), galloping (-8.22 +/- 4.63), and skipping (-8.30 +/- 4.45). Results indicate the pedometer may not consistently register the vertical force produced by the trail foot contact, the lead foot contact, or a combination of the two while skipping, galloping, and sliding. Though the pedometer is a valid instrument when estimating physical activity levels, caution is urged when interpreting movements other than walking.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定计步器在行走、单脚跳、奔跑、滑行和跳跃时的准确性。102名大学生在左右臀部的大腿中部佩戴计步器(Walk4Life LS - 7010)。参与者随后在硬木球场比赛场地的长度(26米)上进行随机分配的动作,在此期间,研究人员用手动计数器记录步数。每只前脚迈出一步就在计数器上记录一次。参与者被指示以轻快的步伐进行动作,在球场末端跳跃停止,并保持静止,直到计步器读数被记录下来。使用邦费罗尼技术的重复测量方差分析用于比较计步器计数和手动计数之间的差异。在所有五种运动动作中,手动计数与左右计步器读数之间存在显著差异(P < .01)。在行走(-1.35 +/- 1.60)和跳跃(-2.94 +/- 2.33)时,手动计数与左右计步器平均值之间的平均误差最低,而在滑行(-6.42 +/- 4.78)、奔跑(-8.22 +/- 4.63)和单脚跳(-8.30 +/- 4.45)时误差增加。结果表明,计步器可能无法始终记录在单脚跳、奔跑和滑行时后脚接触、前脚接触或两者结合产生的垂直力。尽管计步器在估计身体活动水平时是一种有效的工具,但在解释除行走以外的动作时应谨慎。

相似文献

1
Assessing pedometer accuracy while walking, skipping, galloping, sliding, and hopping.评估步行、跳绳、跑步、滑行和单脚跳时计步器的准确性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):276-82. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f2f42.
2
Effects of body mass index on the accuracy of an electronic pedometer.体重指数对电子计步器准确性的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 2003 Nov;24(8):588-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-43272.
3
Pedometer reliability, validity and daily activity targets among 10- to 15-year-old boys.10至15岁男孩的计步器可靠性、有效性及每日活动目标
J Sports Sci. 2006 Mar;24(3):241-51. doi: 10.1080/02640410500141661.
4
Pedometer accuracy in nursing home and community-dwelling older adults.养老院和社区居住老年人中计步器的准确性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Feb;36(2):205-9. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000113476.62469.98.
5
Influence of non-level walking on pedometer accuracy.非水平行走对计步器准确性的影响。
J Sci Med Sport. 2009 May;12(3):361-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.01.007. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
6
Evaluation of a commercially available pedometer used to promote physical activity as part of a national programme.评价一款市售计步器,该计步器作为国家项目的一部分,用于促进身体活动。
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Dec;44(16):1178-83. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.061085. Epub 2009 May 26.
7
The effect of pedometer position and normal gait asymmetry on step count accuracy.计步器位置及正常步态不对称性对步数计数准确性的影响。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Jun;32(3):409-15. doi: 10.1139/H07-001.
8
Effects of age, walking speed, and body composition on pedometer accuracy in children.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007 Dec;78(5):420-8. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599442.
9
Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models.自由生活状态下身体活动的计步器测量:13种型号的比较
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Feb;36(2):331-5. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000113486.60548.E9.
10
Motion sensor accuracy under controlled and free-living conditions.在受控和自由生活条件下运动传感器的准确性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 May;36(5):905-10. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000126777.50188.73.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of pedometer accuracy in capturing habitual types of physical activities in overweight and obese children.评估计步器在记录超重和肥胖儿童日常身体活动类型方面的准确性。
Pediatr Res. 2016 Nov;80(5):686-692. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.133. Epub 2016 Jun 24.