Smith John Damien, Schroeder Cynthia Ann
Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):276-82. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f2f42.
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the pedometer when walking, skipping, galloping, sliding, and hopping. One hundred-two college students were fitted with a pedometer (Walk4Life LS-7010) at mid-thigh on the right and left of the hip. Participants then performed the randomly assigned movements for the length (26 m) of a hardwood court playing surface, during which time the investigator tallied the steps with a hand counter. Each step with the lead foot elicited a tally on the counter. Participants were instructed to perform the movement at a brisk pace, to jump-stop at the end of the court, and to remain still until after the pedometer reading was recorded. Repeated measure ANOVAs using the Bonferroni technique were used to compare differences between pedometer counts and hand counts. Significant differences were evident between the hand tally counts and readings from the right and left pedometers during all five locomotor movements (P < .01). Mean error was lowest between the hand tally and the average of the right and left pedometers while walking (-1.35 +/- 1.60) and hopping (-2.94 +/- 2.33), and increased while sliding (-6.42 +/- 4.78), galloping (-8.22 +/- 4.63), and skipping (-8.30 +/- 4.45). Results indicate the pedometer may not consistently register the vertical force produced by the trail foot contact, the lead foot contact, or a combination of the two while skipping, galloping, and sliding. Though the pedometer is a valid instrument when estimating physical activity levels, caution is urged when interpreting movements other than walking.
本研究的目的是确定计步器在行走、单脚跳、奔跑、滑行和跳跃时的准确性。102名大学生在左右臀部的大腿中部佩戴计步器(Walk4Life LS - 7010)。参与者随后在硬木球场比赛场地的长度(26米)上进行随机分配的动作,在此期间,研究人员用手动计数器记录步数。每只前脚迈出一步就在计数器上记录一次。参与者被指示以轻快的步伐进行动作,在球场末端跳跃停止,并保持静止,直到计步器读数被记录下来。使用邦费罗尼技术的重复测量方差分析用于比较计步器计数和手动计数之间的差异。在所有五种运动动作中,手动计数与左右计步器读数之间存在显著差异(P < .01)。在行走(-1.35 +/- 1.60)和跳跃(-2.94 +/- 2.33)时,手动计数与左右计步器平均值之间的平均误差最低,而在滑行(-6.42 +/- 4.78)、奔跑(-8.22 +/- 4.63)和单脚跳(-8.30 +/- 4.45)时误差增加。结果表明,计步器可能无法始终记录在单脚跳、奔跑和滑行时后脚接触、前脚接触或两者结合产生的垂直力。尽管计步器在估计身体活动水平时是一种有效的工具,但在解释除行走以外的动作时应谨慎。