Mielke Michelle, Housh Terry J, Malek Moh H, Beck Travis W, Schmidt Richard J, Johnson Glen O
Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):293-302. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f58ca.
The purpose of the present study was to use ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) from the Borg (6-20) and OMNI-Leg (0-10) scales to determine the Physical Working Capacity at the Borg and OMNI thresholds (PWC(BORG) and PWC(OMNI)). PWC(BORG) and PWC(OMNI) were compared with other fatigue thresholds determined from the measurement of heart rate (the Physical Working Capacity at the Heart Rate Threshold: PWC(HRT)), and oxygen consumption (the Physical Working Capacity at the Oxygen Consumption Threshold, PWC(VO2)), as well as the ventilatory threshold (VT). Fifteen men and women volunteers (mean age +/- SD = 22 +/- 1 years) performed an incremental test to exhaustion on an electronically braked ergometer for the determination of VO2 peak and VT. The subjects also performed 4 randomly ordered workbouts to exhaustion at different power outputs (ranging from 60 to 206W) for the determination of PWC(BORG), PWC(OMNI), PWC(HRT), and PWC(VO2). The results indicated that there were no significant mean differences among the fatigue thresholds: PWC(BORG) (mean +/- SD = 133 +/- 37W; 67 +/- 8% of VO2 peak), PWC(OMNI) (137 +/- 44W; 68 +/- 9% of VO2 peak), PWC(HRT) (135 +/- 36W; 68 +/- 8% of VO2 peak), PWC(VO2) (145 +/- 41W; 72 +/- 7% of VO2 peak) and VT (131 +/- 45W; 66 +/- 8% of VO2 peak). The results of this study indicated that the mathematical model used to estimate PWC(HRT) and PWC(VO2) can be applied to ratings of perceived exertion to determine PWC(BORG) and PWC(OMNI) during cycle ergometry. Salient features of the PWC(BORG) and PWC(OMNI) tests are that they are simple to administer and require the use of only an RPE scale, a stopwatch, and a cycle ergometer. Furthermore, the power outputs at the PWC(BORG) and PWC(OMNI) may be useful to estimate the VT noninvasively and without the need for expired gas analysis.
本研究的目的是使用博格(6 - 20)量表和OMNI - Leg(0 - 10)量表的主观用力感觉(RPE)评分来确定博格和OMNI阈值下的身体工作能力(PWC(BORG)和PWC(OMNI))。将PWC(BORG)和PWC(OMNI)与通过心率测量确定的其他疲劳阈值(心率阈值下的身体工作能力:PWC(HRT))、耗氧量(耗氧量阈值下的身体工作能力,PWC(VO2))以及通气阈值(VT)进行比较。15名男性和女性志愿者(平均年龄±标准差 = 22±1岁)在电子刹车测力计上进行递增运动至疲劳测试,以确定VO2峰值和VT。受试者还在不同功率输出(范围从60至206W)下进行4次随机排序的运动至疲劳测试,以确定PWC(BORG)、PWC(OMNI)、PWC(HRT)和PWC(VO2)。结果表明,各疲劳阈值之间无显著平均差异:PWC(BORG)(平均±标准差 = 133±37W;VO2峰值的67±8%)、PWC(OMNI)(137±44W;VO2峰值的68±9%)、PWC(HRT)(135±36W;VO2峰值的68±8%)、PWC(VO2)(145±41W;VO2峰值的72±7%)和VT(131±45W;VO2峰值的66±8%)。本研究结果表明,用于估计PWC(HRT)和PWC(VO2)的数学模型可应用于主观用力感觉评分,以确定在自行车测力计运动期间的PWC(BORG)和PWC(OMNI)。PWC(BORG)和PWC(OMNI)测试的显著特点是易于实施,仅需使用RPE量表、秒表和自行车测力计。此外,PWC(BORG)和PWC(OMNI)时的功率输出可能有助于无创估计VT,且无需进行呼出气体分析。