• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吻合器对根治性膀胱切除术的影响:高手术量与低手术量外科医生的比较研究

Impact of stapling devices on radical cystectomy: comparative study between low- and high-volume surgeons.

作者信息

Tzortzis Vassilios, Gravas Stavros, Mitsogiannis Iraklis C, Moutzouris Georgios, Karatzas Anastasios, Leventis Angelos, Mpouzalas Ioannis, Melekos Michael D

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larissa, Greece.

出版信息

Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.032.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.032
PMID:18308115
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare effectiveness in terms of blood loss and operative time of stapling devices among surgeons with different levels of surgical volume.

METHODS

We evaluated a group of 29 male patients with invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy by two groups of surgeons. The first group included two high-volume surgeons, and the second group two low-volume surgeons. All cystectomies were performed using the multifire autosuture articulated vascular Endo-GIA. We compared patients with a series of 28 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy during the same period using standard technique by the same surgeons. Blood loss was defined as the difference between the hemoglobin at the beginning and at the end of cystectomy.

RESULTS

In the group of high-volume surgeons, the mean operative time was 81.4 +/- 17 minutes and 79.3 +/- 20 minutes for the classical and stapler arm, respectively (P = 0.551). In the low-volume surgeons group, the mean operative time was 114.3 +/- 22 minutes and 92.4 +/- 12 minutes for the two methods (P = 0.003). The mean intraoperative blood loss in the experienced surgeons was 2.3 +/- 0.82 g/dL and 1.49 +/- 0.66 g/dL for the classical and stapler arm, respectively (P = 0.008). In the group of low-volume surgeons, the difference in hemoglobin was 3.02 +/- 0.84 g/dL and 1.91 +/- 0.6 g/dL for the two methods (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Stapling devices seem to make cystectomy safer and faster in surgeons with different surgical volumes. The group of low-volume surgeons benefited more.

摘要

目的

比较不同手术量的外科医生使用吻合器在失血和手术时间方面的效果。

方法

我们评估了一组29例浸润性膀胱癌男性患者,他们由两组外科医生进行根治性膀胱切除术。第一组包括两名高手术量的外科医生,第二组包括两名低手术量的外科医生。所有膀胱切除术均使用多钉仓自动缝合关节式血管腔内吻合器(Endo-GIA)进行。我们将这些患者与同期由相同外科医生使用标准技术进行根治性膀胱切除术的28例患者进行了比较。失血定义为膀胱切除术开始和结束时血红蛋白的差值。

结果

在高手术量外科医生组中,经典手术臂和吻合器臂的平均手术时间分别为81.4±17分钟和79.3±20分钟(P = 0.551)。在低手术量外科医生组中,两种方法的平均手术时间分别为114.3±22分钟和92.4±12分钟(P = 0.003)。经验丰富的外科医生中,经典手术臂和吻合器臂的平均术中失血量分别为2.3±0.82 g/dL和1.49±0.6 g/dL(P = 0.008)。在低手术量外科医生组中,两种方法的血红蛋白差值分别为3.02±0.84 g/dL和1.91±0.6 g/dL(P = 0.02)。

结论

吻合器似乎能使不同手术量的外科医生进行膀胱切除术时更安全、更快。低手术量外科医生组受益更多。

相似文献

1
Impact of stapling devices on radical cystectomy: comparative study between low- and high-volume surgeons.吻合器对根治性膀胱切除术的影响:高手术量与低手术量外科医生的比较研究
Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):337-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.032.
2
Decreasing blood loss in patients treated with radical cystectomy: a prospective randomizes trial using a new stapling device.
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):951-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051372.67213.ca.
3
Association between volume and charges for most frequently performed ambulatory and nonambulatory surgery for bladder cancer. Is more cheaper?膀胱癌最常施行的门诊手术和非门诊手术的手术量与费用之间的关联。费用更低吗?
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1056-61. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000136382.51688.21.
4
The impact of stapling devices use on patients with increased body mass index treated with radical cystectomy.
Can J Urol. 2014 Feb;21(1):7114-9.
5
Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality from radical cystectomy: data from the health care utilization project.医院及外科医生手术量对根治性膀胱切除术后住院死亡率的影响:来自医疗保健利用项目的数据
J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1695-700. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154638.61621.03.
6
Impact of tumour volume on surgical and pathological outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.肿瘤体积对机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后手术及病理结果的影响。
BJU Int. 2008 Sep;102(7):840-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07737.x. Epub 2008 May 15.
7
Influence of hospital and surgeon volumes on operative time, blood loss and perioperative complications in radical nephrectomy.医院规模和外科医生手术量对根治性肾切除术的手术时间、失血量及围手术期并发症的影响
Int J Urol. 2008 Aug;15(8):688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02098.x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
8
Radical cystectomy: minimizing operative blood loss with a "stapling technique".
Urology. 2000 Sep 1;56(3):488-91. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00582-3.
9
[Compare of laparoscopic and open surgery for radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder].腹腔镜与开放手术行根治性膀胱切除术并原位回肠新膀胱术的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Dec 15;46(24):1870-4.
10
Radical cystectomy: defining the threshold for a surgeon to achieve optimum outcomes.根治性膀胱切除术:确定外科医生实现最佳治疗效果的阈值。
Postgrad Med J. 2007 Aug;83(982):556-60. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.058214.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of open and intracorporeal modified ureterosigmoidostomy (Mainz II) after laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bladder cancer.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后开放性与体内改良输尿管乙状结肠吻合术(迈因茨II式)治疗膀胱癌的比较
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb 20;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02148-y.
2
Can technical factors explain the volume-outcome relationship in gastric bypass surgery?技术因素能否解释胃旁路手术中的量效关系?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Oct 30.