Papakostas G I, Homberger C H, Fava M
Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Psychopharmacol. 2008 Nov;22(8):843-8. doi: 10.1177/0269881107083808. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
Over the past few years, a number of studies have suggested that the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) with anti-depressants enhancing both noradrenergic as well as serotonergic neurotransmission may result in higher response or remission rates than treatment with anti-depressants selectively enhancing serotonergic neurotransmission. The objective of this paper was to compare response rates among patients with MDD treated with either mirtazapine, an anti-depressant thought to simultaneously enhance both noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Medline/Pubmed were searched. No year of publication limits were used. Double-blind, randomized clinical trials comparing mirtazapine with an SSRI for the treatment of MDD. Data were extracted with the use of a pre-coded form. Analyses were performed comparing response rates between the two anti-depressant agents. Data from 10 reports involving a total of 1904 outpatients with MDD were identified and combined using a random-effects model. Patients randomized to treatment with mirtazapine were as likely to experience clinical response as patients randomized to treatment with an SSRI (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.96-1.2, P = 0.181). Simply pooling response rates between the two agents revealed a 67.1% response rate for mirtazapine and a 62.1% response rate for the SSRIs. There was no difference in overall discontinuation rates (RR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.7-1.5; P = 0.550), discontinuation rates due to adverse events (RR = 0.9; 95% CI: 0.6-1.2; P = 0.497), or discontinuation rates due to lack of efficacy (RR = 0.9; 95% CI: 0.4-2.0; P = 0.871) between the two groups. Fewer mirtazapine-treated patients complained of insomnia (RR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.9; P = 0.017), nausea (RR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.3-0.5; P < 0.0001), whereas fewer SSRI-treated patients complained of fatigue (RR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.4; P = 0.028), excessive sleepiness (RR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1-1.7; P = 0.020), weight-gain (RR = 3.8; 95% CI: 2.3-6.4; P < 0.0001) or dry mouth (RR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3-2.4; P < 0.0001) during the course of treatment. These results suggest that mirtazapine and the SSRIs differ with respect to their side-effect profile but not their overall efficacy in the treatment of MDD.
在过去几年中,多项研究表明,与选择性增强5-羟色胺能神经传递的抗抑郁药相比,使用同时增强去甲肾上腺素能和5-羟色胺能神经传递的抗抑郁药治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)可能会带来更高的缓解率或痊愈率。本文的目的是比较接受米氮平(一种被认为能同时增强去甲肾上腺素能和5-羟色胺能神经传递的抗抑郁药)或选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗的MDD患者的缓解率。检索了Medline/Pubmed数据库,未设定发表年份限制。纳入比较米氮平与SSRI治疗MDD的双盲、随机临床试验。使用预编码表格提取数据。对两种抗抑郁药的缓解率进行比较分析。共识别出10篇报告,涉及1904例MDD门诊患者,并使用随机效应模型进行合并。随机接受米氮平治疗的患者与随机接受SSRI治疗的患者出现临床缓解的可能性相同(RR = 1.07;95% CI:0.96 - 1.2,P = 0.181)。简单合并两种药物的缓解率后发现,米氮平的缓解率为67.1%,SSRI为62.1%。两组在总体停药率(RR = 1.1;95% CI:0.7 - 1.5;P = 0.550)、因不良事件导致的停药率(RR = 0.9;95% CI:0.6 - 1.2;P = 0.497)或因疗效不佳导致的停药率(RR = 0.9;95% CI:0.4 - 2.0;P = 0.871)方面均无差异。在治疗过程中,接受米氮平治疗的患者较少抱怨失眠(RR = 0.5;95% CI:0.3 - 0.9;P = 0.017)、恶心(RR = 0.3;95% CI:0.3 - 0.5;P < 0.0001),而接受SSRI治疗的患者较少抱怨疲劳(RR = 1.5;95% CI:1.1 - 2.4;P = 0.028)、嗜睡(RR = 1.3;95% CI:1.1 - 1.7;P = 0.