• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共病障碍的综合护理:18个月时的精神症状、社会功能和服务成本

Integrated care for co-occurring disorders: psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and service costs at 18 months.

作者信息

Craig Tom K J, Johnson Sonia, McCrone Paul, Afuwape Sarah, Hughes Elizabeth, Gournay Kevin, White Ian, Wanigaratne Shamil, Leese Morven, Thornicroft Graham

机构信息

Health Service and Population Research Department, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Mar;59(3):276-82. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.3.276.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2008.59.3.276
PMID:18308908
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Persons with severe mental illness have high rates of comorbid substance use disorders. These co-occurring disorders present a significant challenge to community mental health services, and few clinical trials are available to guide the development of effective services for this population. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a program for case managers that trained them to manage substance use disorders among persons with severe mental illness.

METHODS

A cluster-randomized controlled trial design was used in South London to allocate case managers either to training or to a waiting list control condition. Outcomes and service costs (health care and criminal justice) over 18 months of 127 patients treated by 40 case managers who received training were compared with those of 105 patients treated by 39 case managers in the control condition.

RESULTS

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores for the intervention group indicated significant improvements in psychotic and general psychopathology symptoms. Participants in the intervention group also reported fewer needs for care at follow-up. No significant differences were found between the two groups in levels of substance use at 18 months. At follow-up both groups reported increased satisfaction with care. Service costs were also similar for the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard care, integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders provided by nonspecialist mental health staff produced significant improvements in symptoms and level of met needs, but not in substance use or quality of life, at no additional cost.

摘要

目的

重度精神疾病患者共患物质使用障碍的比例很高。这些共病障碍给社区心理健康服务带来了重大挑战,而且几乎没有临床试验可用于指导针对这一人群开发有效的服务。该研究旨在评估一项针对个案管理员的项目的有效性,该项目培训他们管理重度精神疾病患者的物质使用障碍。

方法

在伦敦南部采用整群随机对照试验设计,将个案管理员分配到培训组或等待名单对照组。将接受培训的40名个案管理员治疗的127名患者在18个月内的结果和服务成本(医疗保健和刑事司法方面)与对照组中39名个案管理员治疗的105名患者的结果和服务成本进行比较。

结果

干预组的简明精神病评定量表得分表明,精神病性和一般精神病理学症状有显著改善。干预组的参与者在随访时报告的护理需求也较少。两组在18个月时的物质使用水平没有显著差异。在随访时,两组都报告对护理的满意度有所提高。两组的服务成本也相似。

结论

与标准护理相比,由非专科心理健康工作人员提供的共病障碍综合治疗在不增加成本的情况下,在症状和满足需求水平方面有显著改善,但在物质使用或生活质量方面没有改善。

相似文献

1
Integrated care for co-occurring disorders: psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and service costs at 18 months.共病障碍的综合护理:18个月时的精神症状、社会功能和服务成本
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Mar;59(3):276-82. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.3.276.
2
Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment versus standard case management for persons with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders.针对同时患有严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍的患者,积极社区治疗与标准病例管理的成本效益分析
Health Serv Res. 1998 Dec;33(5 Pt 1):1285-308.
3
Randomised controlled trial to improve health and reduce substance use in established psychosis (IMPaCT): cost-effectiveness of integrated psychosocial health promotion.随机对照试验改善既定精神病患者的健康和减少物质使用 (IMPaCT):综合心理社会健康促进的成本效益。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 22;17(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1570-1.
4
Substance abuse in schizophrenia: service utilization and costs.精神分裂症中的物质滥用:服务利用与成本
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993 Apr;181(4):227-32. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199304000-00003.
5
Impact of co-occurring substance use on 6 month outcomes for young people seeking mental health treatment.同时存在物质使用问题对寻求心理健康治疗的年轻人6个月治疗效果的影响。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;41(11):896-902. doi: 10.1080/00048670701634986.
6
A randomized clinical trial of a new behavioral treatment for drug abuse in people with severe and persistent mental illness.一项针对患有严重和持续性精神疾病的药物滥用者的新型行为治疗的随机临床试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;63(4):426-32. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.4.426.
7
Costs of treating patients with schizophrenia who have illness-related crisis events.治疗患有与疾病相关危机事件的精神分裂症患者的费用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Aug 26;8:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-72.
8
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
9
A dual diagnosis demonstration project: treatment outcomes and cost analysis.一个双重诊断示范项目:治疗结果与成本分析。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003 May;35 Suppl 1:181-92. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2003.10400513.
10
Effectiveness of a housing support team intervention with a recovery-oriented approach on hospital and emergency department use by homeless people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial.以康复为导向的住房支持团队干预对严重精神疾病 homeless 人群住院和急诊使用的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Sep 30;29:e169. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000785.

引用本文的文献

1
Avatar Intervention in Virtual Reality for Cannabis Use Disorder in Individuals With Severe Mental Disorders: Results From a 1-Year, Single-Arm Clinical Trial.虚拟现实中的化身干预对严重精神障碍个体大麻使用障碍的影响:一项为期 1 年的单臂临床试验结果。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Nov 27;11:e58499. doi: 10.2196/58499.
2
Avatar Intervention for Cannabis Use Disorder in Individuals with Severe Mental Disorders: A Pilot Study.针对重度精神障碍患者大麻使用障碍的阿凡达干预:一项试点研究。
J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 29;13(5):766. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050766.
3
Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse.
针对患有严重精神疾病和药物滥用问题者的社会心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 12;12(12):CD001088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001088.pub4.
4
Experts by Experience: Peer Support and its Use with the Homeless.经验丰富者成为专家:同伴支持及其在无家可归者中的应用。
Community Ment Health J. 2017 Jul;53(5):598-612. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0102-2. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
5
Patient satisfaction with treatment for alcohol use disorders: comparing patients with and without severe mental health symptoms.酒精使用障碍患者对治疗的满意度:有严重心理健康症状和无严重心理健康症状患者的比较。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Aug 4;10:1489-500. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S92902. eCollection 2016.
6
Psychosocial Interventions in Reducing Cannabis Use in Early Phase Psychosis: A Canadian Survey of Treatments Offered.心理社会干预在减少早期精神病患者大麻使用方面的作用:一项关于加拿大所提供治疗方法的调查。
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;61(6):367-72. doi: 10.1177/0706743716639931. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Use of health care services by patients with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders.患有严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍的患者对医疗服务的使用情况。
Ment Health Subst Use. 2008 Sep 19;1(3):216-227. doi: 10.1080/17523280802274886.
8
Chronic care management for substance dependence in primary care among patients with co-occurring disorders.针对共病患者在初级保健中对物质依赖进行的慢性护理管理。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jan 1;66(1):72-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300414. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
9
Efficacy of community treatments for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a literature review.精神分裂症及其他精神障碍的社区治疗效果:文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 9;4:116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00116.
10
Examining the cost effectiveness of interventions to promote the physical health of people with mental health problems: a systematic review.评估促进有心理健康问题者身体健康的干预措施的成本效益:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 29;13:787. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-787.