Young Colin N, Prasad Raju Y, Fullenkamp Adam M, Stillbower Michael E, Farquhar William B, Edwards David G
Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, 142 Human Performance Laboratory, University of Delaware, 541 South College Avenue, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 May;104(5):1374-80. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00825.2007. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether ultrasound is a useful tool to measure the venous characteristics of the lower extremity during a standard venous collecting cuff deflation protocol. To accomplish this, lower extremity pressure-cross-sectional area (CSA) and pressure-volume relationships were measured in eight (25 +/- 1 yr) supine subjects. Popliteal vein CSA was assessed by using high-resolution ultrasound, while calf volume changes were simultaneously assessed by using venous occlusion plethysmography (VOP). Pressure-CSA and pressure-volume relationships were assessed at baseline, during the cold pressor (CP) test, and following sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG) administration. Relationships were modeled with a quadratic regression equation, and beta(1) and beta(2) were used as indexes of venous compliance. Popliteal vein regression parameters beta(1) (8.485 +/- 2.616 vs. 7.638 +/- 2.664, baseline vs. CP; 8.485 +/- 2.616 vs. 7.734 +/- 3.076, baseline vs. NTG; both P > 0.05) and beta(2) (-0.0841 +/- 0.0241 vs. -0.0793 +/- 0.0242, baseline vs. CP; -0.0841 +/- 0.0241 vs. -0.0771 +/- 0.0280, baseline vs. NTG; both P > 0.05) were not affected by CP or NTG. Similarly, calf regression parameters beta(1) and beta(2), obtained with VOP, were not altered during either trial. Intraclass correlations for venous compliance assessed with ultrasound and VOP were 0.92 and 0.97, respectively, indicating acceptable reproducibility. These data suggest that ultrasound is a functional and reproducible tool to assess the venous characteristics of the lower extremity, in addition to VOP. Additionally, popliteal vein and calf compliance were not affected by the CP test or NTG.
本研究的目的是确定在标准静脉采集袖带放气方案期间,超声是否是测量下肢静脉特征的有用工具。为实现这一目的,在八名(25±1岁)仰卧位受试者中测量了下肢压力-横截面积(CSA)和压力-容积关系。使用高分辨率超声评估腘静脉CSA,同时使用静脉阻塞体积描记法(VOP)评估小腿体积变化。在基线、冷加压(CP)试验期间以及舌下含服硝酸甘油(NTG)后评估压力-CSA和压力-容积关系。用二次回归方程对关系进行建模,β(1)和β(2)用作静脉顺应性指标。腘静脉回归参数β(1)(基线与CP相比:8.485±2.616对7.638±2.664;基线与NTG相比:8.485±2.616对7.734±3.076;两者P>0.05)和β(2)(基线与CP相比:-0.0841±0.0241对-0.0793±0.0242;基线与NTG相比:-0.0841±0.0241对-0.0771±0.0280;两者P>0.05)不受CP或NTG影响。同样,通过VOP获得的小腿回归参数β(1)和β(2)在任何一项试验中均未改变。用超声和VOP评估的静脉顺应性的组内相关性分别为0.92和0.97,表明具有可接受的重复性。这些数据表明,除VOP外,超声是评估下肢静脉特征的一种实用且可重复的工具。此外,腘静脉和小腿顺应性不受CP试验或NTG影响。