Keitel W
Z Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;67(2):165-71. doi: 10.1007/s00393-007-0255-4.
The article presents three pathologists who have made important contributions to the understanding of rheumatic diseases. Ludwig Aschoff's (1866-1942) work formed the foundation and was for a long time at the centre of the discussion on pathology of rheumatic diseases. Impetus was added from a rheumatological perspective by the discovery of the Aschoff nodule as an indicator of rheumatic myocarditis. Thus, newly manifested rheumatic carditis is only diagnosed when rheumatic nodules are found. Fritz Klinge (1892-1974), following in Aschoff's footsteps, broke new ground in rheumatology in Germany. From extensive animal tests at a Leipzig institute he induced inflammatory reactions, necrosis and cell proliferation which, due to repeated sensitization, lead to arthritis and periarthritis. He identified therein a relationship to human rheumatism, which he considered to be caused by an allergic (hyperergic) reaction of the mesenchyme. In his opinion, the varying manifestations of rheumatic fever and rheumatoid arthritis presented one and the same pathological event. His main achievements were to close the gap between method-related deficits in morphology and the myriad clinical observations in the field of"rheumatic" diseases and to create a pathoanatomic platform for"rheumatism". Siegfried Gräff (1899-1947) was a strong critic of Klinge. He only ever relied on individual post mortem observations and was skeptical of animal testing in a rheumatological context. He considered"rheumatism" as a symptom, refuting its status as a disease. He distinguished rheumatic fever, as characterized by the Aschoff granuloma, from a second"rheuma-symptom" disease group, namely non-specific chronic polyarthritis (rheumatoid arthritis).
本文介绍了三位对风湿性疾病的理解做出重要贡献的病理学家。路德维希·阿绍夫(1866 - 1942)的工作奠定了基础,并且在很长一段时间里一直是风湿性疾病病理学讨论的核心。阿绍夫结节作为风湿性心肌炎的指标被发现,从风湿病学角度为这一讨论增添了动力。因此,只有在发现风湿结节时才诊断出新出现的风湿性心脏病。弗里茨·克林格(1892 - 1974)追随阿绍夫的脚步,在德国风湿病学领域开辟了新的道路。他在莱比锡的一家研究所进行了广泛的动物实验,并诱导出炎症反应、坏死和细胞增殖,由于反复致敏,这些反应导致了关节炎和周围关节炎。他在其中确定了与人类风湿病的关系,他认为这是由间充质的过敏(超敏)反应引起的。在他看来,风湿热和类风湿关节炎的不同表现呈现出同一个病理事件。他的主要成就在于弥合了形态学方法相关缺陷与“风湿性”疾病领域众多临床观察之间的差距,并为“风湿病”创建了一个病理解剖学平台。西格弗里德·格拉夫(1899 - 1947)是克林格的强烈批评者。他只依赖个体尸检观察,并且对风湿病学背景下的动物实验持怀疑态度。他认为“风湿病”是一种症状,驳斥了其作为一种疾病的地位。他将以阿绍夫肉芽肿为特征的风湿热与第二个“风湿症状”疾病组,即非特异性慢性多关节炎(类风湿关节炎)区分开来。