Oxygen in neonatal and infant anesthesia--current practice in the UK.

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing awareness of the role of oxygen free radicals in the pathogenesis of many conditions associated with prematurity, which has led to caution in the use of oxygen in neonatal resuscitation. We surveyed the practice of UK pediatric anesthetists with regard to oxygen use in neonatal and infant anesthesia.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire survey of 460 UK-based members of the Association of Pediatric Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 247 pediatric anesthetists (54%). Seventy-five percent of anesthetists aim to avoid the use of 100% oxygen during routine infant anesthesia and 52% aim for an FiO(2) of < 0.4 in neonates. The factors most influencing choice of carrier gas are optimal oxygenation and the avoidance of pulmonary atelectasis. Sixteen percent stated that unavailability of medical air is a factor. Opinion was divided on concern about the effects of anesthetic agents on the developing brain. Moderate levels of concern were expressed about the potential toxic effects of oxygen on the eyes and lungs of premature newborns but this concern does not extend to term newborns. Only 20% of anesthetists had any recent knowledge of these issues.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey indicates that there is no consistency in attitudes and practices and demonstrates considerable variation in the use of oxygen during anesthesia in premature and newborn babies and infants. This may reflect the paucity of evidence in the anesthetic literature on the potential harmful effects of high concentrations of oxygen in vulnerable groups of infants.