• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耻骨后尿道悬吊术并发症的综合综述

A comprehensive review of suburethral sling procedure complications.

作者信息

Stanford Edward J, Paraiso Marie Fidela R

机构信息

Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Centralia, Illinois 62801, USA.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):132-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.11.004. Epub 2008 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2007.11.004
PMID:18312981
Abstract

The study objective was to review the existing literature regarding complications of anti-incontinence sling procedures. PubMed listings using keywords related to slings and associated complications with no date or language restrictions through May 2007 and the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database were searched for specific device- and procedure-related complications. Where no information was available, published abstracts were cited. Published reports of complications for all types of anti-incontinence sling procedures are analyzed and reported. Sling-related complications are multiple but can be summarized from studies on 13737 cumulative patients as involving: voiding dysfunction (8 studies, 881 patients, 16.3% average overall incidence [OI]); detrusor overactivity (20 studies, 1950 patients, 15.4% OI); urinary retention (14 studies, 943 patients, 14.2% OI); erosion/extrusion (19 studies, 2197 patients, 6.03% OI); impact on quality of life-dyspareunia (2 studies, 175 patients, 4.3% OI); infections-most often urinary tract infections but severe infections such as abscess are reported (19 studies, 1487 patients, 5.5% OI); hematoma-most often pelvic or vaginal (4 studies, 3691 patients, 2% OI); pain (6 studies, 597 patients, 7.3% OI); abdominal and pelvic organ injury-bladder, urethra, vagina, and intestines (10 studies, 1816 patients, 3.3% OI); systemic complications-deep vein thrombosis, sepsis (case reports); and death (case reports). Cure rates for all slings are as follows: subjective (16 studies, 1541 patients, 95% OI, range 63%-99%), objective (15 studies, 1203 patients, 82% OI, range 51%-97%), and failure (8 studies, 599 patients, 11.5% OI, range 4%-37%). It is likely that sling-related complications are under-reported in the published medical literature and in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database. This review reports on the incidence of known complications for all types of slings. Some complications are common to all sling techniques; however, with development of minimally invasive slings, device-related complications are reported and compared.

摘要

本研究的目的是回顾关于抗尿失禁吊带手术并发症的现有文献。通过检索截至2007年5月不受日期或语言限制的、使用与吊带及相关并发症相关关键词的PubMed列表以及制造商和用户设施设备经验数据库,查找特定的与设备和手术相关的并发症。在没有可用信息的情况下,引用已发表的摘要。对所有类型抗尿失禁吊带手术的并发症发表报告进行分析并报告。与吊带相关的并发症多种多样,但可根据对13737例累积患者的研究总结为:排尿功能障碍(8项研究,881例患者,总体平均发生率[OI]为16.3%);逼尿肌过度活动(20项研究,1950例患者,OI为15.4%);尿潴留(14项研究,943例患者,OI为14.2%);侵蚀/挤出(19项研究,2197例患者,OI为6.03%);对生活质量的影响——性交困难(2项研究,175例患者,OI为4.3%);感染——最常见的是尿路感染,但也有严重感染如脓肿的报告(19项研究,1487例患者,OI为5.5%);血肿——最常见于盆腔或阴道(4项研究,3691例患者,OI为2%);疼痛(6项研究,597例患者,OI为7.3%);腹部和盆腔器官损伤——膀胱、尿道、阴道和肠道(10项研究,1816例患者,OI为3.3%);全身并发症——深静脉血栓形成、败血症(病例报告);以及死亡(病例报告)。所有吊带的治愈率如下:主观治愈率(16项研究,1541例患者,OI为95%,范围为63%-99%),客观治愈率(15项研究,1203例患者,OI为82%,范围为51%-97%),失败率(8项研究,599例患者,OI为11.5%,范围为4%-37%)。在已发表的医学文献以及制造商和用户设施设备经验数据库中,与吊带相关的并发症可能报告不足。本综述报告了所有类型吊带已知并发症的发生率。一些并发症是所有吊带技术共有的;然而,随着微创吊带的发展,报告并比较了与设备相关的并发症。

相似文献

1
A comprehensive review of suburethral sling procedure complications.耻骨后尿道悬吊术并发症的综合综述
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):132-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.11.004. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
2
Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: Are complications under-reported?经尿道中段吊带术主要并发症的表现与处理:并发症是否报告不足?
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):46-52. doi: 10.1002/nau.20357.
3
Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials.中段尿道吊带术的并发症:未来临床试验的重要结果
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.029. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
4
Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms.早期与晚期中线吊带松解术在改善下尿路症状方面效果更佳。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):564.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.018. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.耻骨后开放式阴道膀胱悬吊术治疗女性尿失禁:Cochrane系统评价短版
Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(6):472-80. doi: 10.1002/nau.20780.
6
Management of the complications of the synthetic slings.合成吊带并发症的管理
Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Jul;16(4):240-3. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000232043.95427.d6.
7
The bone anchor suburethral synthetic sling for iatrogenic male incontinence: critical evaluation at a mean 3-year followup.用于医源性男性尿失禁的骨锚耻骨后合成吊带:平均3年随访的关键评估
J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.022. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
8
Voiding dysfunction after anti-incontinence surgery.抗尿失禁手术后的排尿功能障碍。
Minerva Ginecol. 2009 Apr;61(2):167-72.
9
Are complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery procedures associated with the position of the sling?压力性尿失禁手术的并发症与吊带位置有关吗?
Int J Urol. 2017 Feb;24(2):145-150. doi: 10.1111/iju.13262. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
The evolution of midurethral slings.中段尿道吊带的演变
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008 Apr;5(4):194-201. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1052. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of translabial ultrasound in pre- and postoperative assessment of midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence.经唇超声在压力性尿失禁患者尿道中段吊带术前及术后评估中的作用
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05150-0.
2
Evaluation of the efficacy of mini-sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence through patient-reported outcomes and transperineal ultrasonography.通过患者报告结局和经会阴超声评估迷你吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2025 Jun 10;26(2):98-108. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2024-8-7.
3
Sonography as a Diagnostic Tool in Midurethral Sling Complications: A Narrative Review.
超声检查作为中段尿道吊带并发症的诊断工具:一项叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 18;13(8):2336. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082336.
4
Bladder neck incompetence could be an etiology of overactive bladder syndrome in women with stress urinary incontinence after anti-incontinence surgery: insights from transrectal sonography.经直肠超声对压力性尿失禁术后伴有急迫性尿失禁的女性膀胱颈功能不全的病因学分析
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3083-3089. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04639-x. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
5
Retropubic slings are more efficient than transobturator at 10-year follow-up: a Swedish register-based study.经耻骨后吊带在 10 年随访时比经闭孔吊带更有效:一项瑞典基于注册的研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jun;34(6):1307-1315. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05506-4. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Urgency and urgency incontinence following stress urinary incontinence surgery: A review of evaluation and management.压力性尿失禁手术后的急迫性和急迫性尿失禁:评估与管理综述
Indian J Urol. 2022 Oct-Dec;38(4):268-275. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_147_22. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
7
The use of autologous skeletal muscle progenitor cells for adjunctive treatment of presumptive urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence in female dogs.使用自体骨骼肌祖细胞辅助治疗女性犬疑似尿道括约肌机制不全。
J Vet Intern Med. 2022 Sep;36(5):1686-1692. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16505. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Preoperative abdominal straining in uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence: is there a correlation with voiding dysfunction and overactive bladder after mid-urethral sling procedures?单纯性压力性尿失禁患者术前腹压增加:与尿道中段吊带术后排尿功能障碍及膀胱过度活动症是否相关?
Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Nov 24;13:17562872211058243. doi: 10.1177/17562872211058243. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
9
Urethrovaginal fistula repair with or without concurrent fascial sling placement: A retrospective review.伴或不伴同期筋膜吊带置入的尿道阴道瘘修补术:一项回顾性研究
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 May;15(5):E276-E280. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6786.
10
Comparison of retropubic midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.经耻骨后尿道中段吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Apr;31(4):711-716. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04080-y. Epub 2019 Aug 13.