Chong D P
Department of Chemistry, 2036 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada.
J Chem Phys. 2008 Feb 28;128(8):084112. doi: 10.1063/1.2832862.
In this paper, double ionization energies (DIEs) of gas-phase atoms and molecules are calculated by energy difference method with density functional theory. To determine the best functional for double ionization energies, we first study 24 main group atoms in the second, third, and fourth periods. An approximation is used in which the electron density is first obtained from a density functional computation with the exchange-correlation potential V xc known as statistical average of orbital potentials, after which the energy is computed from that density with 59 different exchange-correlation energy functionals E xc. For the 24 atoms, the two best E xc functional providing DIEs with average absolute deviation (AAD) of only 0.25 eV are the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functional modified by Hammer et al. [Phys. Rev. B 59, 6413 (1999)] and one known as the Krieger-Chen-Iafrate-Savin functional modified by Krieger et al. (unpublished). Surprisingly, none of the 20 available hybrid functionals is among the top 15 functionals for the DIEs of the 24 atoms. A similar procedure is then applied to molecules, with opposite results: Only hybrid functionals are among the top 15 functionals for a selection of 29 molecules. The best E xc functional for the 29 molecules is found to be the Becke 1997 functional modified by Wilson et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 115, 9233 (2001)]. With that functional, the AAD from experiment for DIEs of 29 molecules is just under 0.5 eV. If the two suspected values for C2H2 and Fe(CO)5 are excluded, the AAD improves to 0.3(2) eV. Many other hybrid functionals perform almost as well.
在本文中,采用密度泛函理论的能量差方法计算了气相原子和分子的双电离能。为了确定用于双电离能的最佳泛函,我们首先研究了第二、第三和第四周期的24种主族原子。采用一种近似方法,首先通过密度泛函计算获得电子密度,其中交换关联势(V_{xc})为轨道势的统计平均值,然后用59种不同的交换关联能量泛函(E_{xc})从该密度计算能量。对于这24种原子,提供双电离能且平均绝对偏差(AAD)仅为0.25 eV的两种最佳(E_{xc})泛函是由哈默等人修改的佩德韦-伯克-恩泽霍夫泛函[《物理评论B》59, 6413 (1999)]和由克里格等人修改的一种称为克里格-陈-亚弗拉特-萨文泛函(未发表)。令人惊讶的是,20种可用的杂化泛函中没有一种在24种原子双电离能的前15种泛函之中。然后将类似的程序应用于分子,结果相反:对于29种分子的选择,只有杂化泛函在前15种泛函之中。发现用于这29种分子的最佳(E_{xc})泛函是由威尔逊等人修改的贝克1997泛函[《化学物理杂志》115, 9233 (2001)]。使用该泛函,29种分子双电离能与实验值的AAD略低于0.5 eV。如果排除(C_2H_2)和(Fe(CO)_5)的两个可疑值,AAD提高到0.3(2) eV。许多其他杂化泛函的表现几乎同样出色。