• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度柔韧性扁平足畸形的负重CT扫描

Weightbearing CT scan of severe flexible pes planus deformities.

作者信息

Ferri Melanie, Scharfenberger Angela V, Goplen Gord, Daniels Timothy R, Pearce Dawn

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Feb;29(2):199-204. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0199.

DOI:10.3113/FAI.2008.0199
PMID:18315976
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The three-dimensional relationships of the bones in the foot in a flatfoot deformity are difficult to assess with standard radiographs. CT scans demonstrate these relationships but are typically made in a nonweightbearing mode. Our objective was to assess the use of a weightbearing CT apparatus to image the feet in patients with severe flexible pes planus deformities and to better define the anatomical changes that occur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A specialized device was designed and constructed to simulate weightbearing to the feet during CT examination. Eighteen normal feet and 30 painful severe and flexible pes planus feet were imaged in both the non weightbearing and weightbearing states, set at 50% of body weight. Several measurements of intertarsal relationships were made of the pes planus and normal feet. Navicular floor to skin distance, forefoot arch angle, and subtalar joint subluxation were measured in the coronal plane in both the weightbearing and nonweightbearing states. T-tests were used to analyze measurements of navicular floor to skin distance and forefoot arch angle.

RESULTS

The weightbearing device had a significant effect on foot configuration for both normal and pes planus feet (p = 0.0008) and (p < 0.0001) respectively for both floor to skin distance and forefoot arch angle. There was a significant difference between normal feet and pes planus feet with regard to the forefoot arch angle in the nonweightbearing (p = 0.02) and weightbearing states (p = 0.01). Four of the pes planus patients had evidence of subtalar joint subluxation which was more pronounced in the weightbearing state. There was no significant difference between the navicular floor to skin distance in the normal versus pes planus feet in either the non weightbearing (p = 0.05) or the weightbearing states (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

A device was designed and constructed to apply a weightbearing load equal to that of 50% body weight with minimal to no patient discomfort. The resultant effects on foot configuration were significant, and are useful for assessment of degree of flexible flat foot deformity, thus guiding clinical management. The measure which most significantly differed between pes planus patients and normal volunteers was the forefoot arch angle. Forefoot arch angle may therefore be the most useful measure for the imaging diagnosis of flexible pes planus, and the degree of planus deformity.

摘要

背景

扁平足畸形时足部骨骼的三维关系难以通过标准X线片进行评估。CT扫描能显示这些关系,但通常是在非负重状态下进行的。我们的目的是评估使用负重CT设备对重度柔韧性扁平足畸形患者的足部进行成像,并更好地明确所发生的解剖学变化。

材料与方法

设计并制造了一种专门的装置,用于在CT检查期间模拟足部负重。对18只正常足和30只疼痛性重度柔韧性扁平足在非负重和负重状态(设定为体重 的50%)下进行成像。对扁平足和正常足的跗骨间关系进行了多项测量。在负重和非负重状态下,在冠状面测量舟骨底面至皮肤的距离、前足弓角度和距下关节半脱位情况。采用t检验分析舟骨底面至皮肤距离和前足弓角度的测量结果。

结果

负重装置对正常足和扁平足的足部形态均有显著影响(分别对底面至皮肤距离和前足弓角度,p = 0.0008和p < 0.0001)。在非负重(p = 0.02)和负重状态(p = 0.01)下,正常足和扁平足的前足弓角度存在显著差异。4例扁平足患者有距下关节半脱位的证据,在负重状态下更为明显。在非负重(p = 0.05)或负重状态(p = 0.07)下,正常足与扁平足的舟骨底面至皮肤距离均无显著差异。

结论

设计并制造了一种装置,可施加相当于体重50%的负重,且患者不适感最小或无不适感。对足部形态产生的结果具有显著意义,有助于评估柔韧性扁平足畸形的程度,从而指导临床治疗。扁平足患者与正常志愿者之间差异最显著的测量指标是前足弓角度。因此,前足弓角度可能是柔韧性扁平足成像诊断及扁平畸形程度最有用的测量指标。

相似文献

1
Weightbearing CT scan of severe flexible pes planus deformities.重度柔韧性扁平足畸形的负重CT扫描
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Feb;29(2):199-204. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0199.
2
Influence of tibialis posterior muscle activation on foot anatomy under axial loading: A biomechanical CT human cadaveric study.轴向负荷下胫后肌激活对足部解剖结构的影响:一项生物力学CT人体尸体研究。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Dec;23(4):250-254. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
3
Evaluation of the Foot Arch in Partial Weightbearing Conditions.部分负重状态下足弓的评估。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jan;43(1):113-122. doi: 10.1177/10711007211034804. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
Talonavicular joint coverage and bone morphology between different foot types.不同足型的距跟关节覆盖和骨形态。
J Orthop Res. 2014 Jul;32(7):958-66. doi: 10.1002/jor.22612. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
5
Weight-bearing radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography examinations in adult acquired flatfoot deformity.成人获得性扁平足畸形的负重位 X 线片和锥形束 CT 检查。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Feb;27(2):201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Correlation of Harris mats, physical exam, pictures, and radiographic measurements in adult flatfoot deformity.成人扁平足畸形中哈里斯垫、体格检查、图片及影像学测量的相关性
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jul;30(7):604-12. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0604.
7
The influence of the Peroneus Longus muscle on the foot under axial loading: A CT evaluated dynamic cadaveric model study.轴向负荷下腓骨长肌对足部的影响:一项CT评估的动态尸体模型研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 May;34:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
Load response of the medial longitudinal arch in patients with flatfoot deformity: in vivo 3D study.扁平足畸形患者内侧纵弓的负荷反应:一项体内三维研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013 Jun;28(5):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 2.
9
Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet.足姿势与步态期间足部的运动学相关:正常足、扁平足和高弓足的比较。
Gait Posture. 2015 Jun;42(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Weight-bearing three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of the forefoot in patients with flatfoot deformity.扁平足畸形患者前足的负重三维计算机断层扫描分析
J Orthop Sci. 2016 Mar;21(2):154-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Forefoot Centre of Pressure Patterns in Black Male African Recreational Runners with Pes Planus.患有扁平足的非洲裔黑人男性休闲跑步者前足压力模式
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jul 16;10(3):273. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10030273.
2
Weightbearing Computed Tomography (WBCT) Analysis of Subtalar Joint Dynamics in Hindfoot Valgus Malalignment.后足外翻畸形中距下关节动力学的负重计算机断层扫描(WBCT)分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 9;14(8):2587. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082587.
3
Weightbearing Computed Tomography Measurements in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: A Contemporary Review.
进行性塌陷性足部畸形的负重计算机断层扫描测量:当代综述
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2025 Feb 26;10(1):24730114251316547. doi: 10.1177/24730114251316547. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Treating symptomatic flexible flatfoot deformities. a novel technique: comparison of uc berkeley laboratory foot orthosis with and without kinesio taping in juvenil athletes.治疗有症状的柔韧性平足畸形。一种新的技术:加州大学伯克利分校足部矫形器联合和不联合肌内效贴布在青少年运动员中的比较。
Int Orthop. 2024 Aug;48(8):2083-2090. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06205-5. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Decreased Peritalar Subluxation in Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity with Ankle Valgus Tilting.伴有踝关节外翻倾斜的进行性塌陷性足畸形中距下关节半脱位减少
JB JS Open Access. 2023 Oct 27;8(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00025. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
6
Biomechanics of transverse axis of medial longitudinal arch of children's foot based on 3D scanning.基于三维扫描的儿童足内侧纵弓横轴生物力学研究
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jul 10;11:1197439. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1197439. eCollection 2023.
7
Medial talar resection: how much remains stable?距骨内侧楔形骨切除:保留多少才稳定?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3961-3967. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01915-0. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
Association between subtalar articular surface typing and flat foot deformity: which type is more likely to cause flat foot deformity.距下关节表面分型与扁平足畸形的相关性:哪种类型更易导致扁平足畸形。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 23;22(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04872-8.
9
Weightbearing Computed Tomography for Assessment of Foot and Ankle Deformities: The Iowa Experience.负重位计算机断层扫描评估足踝畸形:爱荷华经验。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):111-119.
10
The Rotational Positioning of the Bones in the Medial Column of the Foot: A Weightbearing CT Analysis.足部内侧柱骨的旋转定位:负重 CT 分析。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):103-109.