• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关键事件技术与儿童牙科:一个实例

The critical incident technique and pediatric dentistry: a worked example.

作者信息

FitzGerald Kirsten, Seale N Sue, Kerins Carolyn A, McElvaney Rosaleen, Fitzgerald Elaine

机构信息

Dental Department, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2008 Mar;72(3):305-16.

PMID:18316535
Abstract

Evaluating dental students' experiences in pediatric dentistry may help dental educators better prepare graduates to treat the children in their communities. This qualitative investigation aimed to collect and analyze data using the critical incident technique (CIT). Sixty dental students at one southwestern dental school participated in 103 recorded interviews. They described 150 positive and 134 negative experiences related to the pediatric dentistry clinic. Analysis of the data resulted in the identification of four key factors related to their experiences: 1) the instructor; 2) the patient; 3) the learning process; and 4) the learning environment. The contribution made by the patient to dental students' education has not been previously addressed. The CIT is a useful data collection and analysis technique that provides rich, useful data and has many potential uses in dental education.

摘要

评估牙科学生在儿童牙科方面的经历,可能有助于牙科教育工作者更好地培养毕业生,以便他们为所在社区的儿童提供治疗。这项定性研究旨在运用关键事件技术(CIT)收集和分析数据。一所西南牙科学校的60名牙科学生参与了103次录音访谈。他们描述了与儿童牙科诊所相关的150次积极经历和134次消极经历。对数据的分析确定了与他们的经历相关的四个关键因素:1)指导教师;2)患者;3)学习过程;4)学习环境。患者对牙科学生教育的贡献此前尚未得到探讨。关键事件技术是一种有用的数据收集和分析技术,它能提供丰富、有用的数据,并且在牙科教育中有许多潜在用途。

相似文献

1
The critical incident technique and pediatric dentistry: a worked example.关键事件技术与儿童牙科:一个实例
J Dent Educ. 2008 Mar;72(3):305-16.
2
Evaluation of undergraduate clinical learning experiences in the subject of pediatric dentistry using critical incident technique.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013 Apr-Jun;31(2):100-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.115710.
3
Students' perceptions of effective learning experiences in dental school: a qualitative study using a critical incident technique.牙科学生对牙科学院有效学习经历的认知:一项运用关键事件技术的定性研究
J Dent Educ. 2006 Feb;70(2):124-32.
4
Increasing general dentists' provision of care to child patients through changes in the undergraduate pediatric dentistry program.通过改变本科儿科牙科课程,增加普通牙医为儿童患者提供的护理。
J Dent Educ. 2005 Mar;69(3):371-7.
5
Dental students' perceptions of community-based education: a retrospective study at a dental school in Brazil.巴西某牙科学院一项基于社区教育的回顾性研究:牙科学员的认知。
J Dent Educ. 2012 Sep;76(9):1218-25.
6
The critical incident technique: a useful tool for conducting qualitative research.关键事件技术:一种进行定性研究的有用工具。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Mar;72(3):299-304.
7
Reflections on academic careers by current dental school faculty.现任牙科学院教员对学术生涯的思考。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Apr;72(4):448-57.
8
Appraisal of the dental school learning environment: the students' view.牙科学院学习环境评估:学生视角
J Dent Educ. 2005 Oct;69(10):1137-47.
9
First-year students' perceptions about pediatric dental behavior guidance techniques: the effect of education.一年级学生对儿童牙科行为指导技术的认知:教育的影响。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Sep;72(9):1029-41.
10
A blended learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school: follow-up evaluation.在牙科学院针对不同学习群体开展的混合式学习课程:后续评估
J Dent Educ. 2008 Sep;72(9):1048-57.

引用本文的文献

1
The challenging reality of the clinical learning environment at Damascus University Faculty of Dental Medicine in Syria: a qualitative study.叙利亚大马士革大学牙医学院临床学习环境面临的挑战现实:一项定性研究
MedEdPublish (2016). 2023 Jul 31;13:24. doi: 10.12688/mep.19564.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Development and implementation of the Clinical Tooth Shade Differentiation Course--an evaluation over 3 years.临床牙齿色泽鉴别课程的开发与实施——三年评估
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Feb 15;33(1):Doc2. doi: 10.3205/zma001001. eCollection 2016.