• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[全身麻醉与全身麻醉加硬膜外阻滞期间血浆儿茶酚胺变化的比较]

[Comparison of changes in plasma catecholamines between general anesthesia and general anesthesia plus epidural block].

作者信息

Jia N

机构信息

PUMC Hospital, Beijing.

出版信息

Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 1991 Apr;13(2):112-4.

PMID:1831707
Abstract

To investigate the stress-response during anesthesia-operation, 16 patients were allocated into either of two groups. Eight cases in Group A underwent an operation on the abdomen under general anesthesia, while the other eight cases in Group B were operated under general anesthesia plus epidural block. Plasma catecholamine levels were measured in all subjects during anesthesia operation procedure. A significant increase in the levels of plasma catecholamines was observed at 45 min after incision in Group A (1.82 +/- 0.48 vs. 0.94 +/- 0.19 ng/ml, P less than 0.05, paired t-test), while no change was seen in Group B during the whole procedure. The result may indicate that an operation on the abdomen rather than general anesthesia itself is responsible for the observed increase in plasma catecholamines level.

摘要

为研究麻醉手术期间的应激反应,将16例患者分为两组。A组8例患者在全身麻醉下进行腹部手术,而B组另外8例患者在全身麻醉加硬膜外阻滞下进行手术。在麻醉手术过程中测量所有受试者的血浆儿茶酚胺水平。A组在切开后45分钟时观察到血浆儿茶酚胺水平显著升高(1.82±0.48 vs. 0.94±0.19 ng/ml,配对t检验,P<0.05),而B组在整个过程中未见变化。结果可能表明,是腹部手术而非全身麻醉本身导致了观察到的血浆儿茶酚胺水平升高。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of changes in plasma catecholamines between general anesthesia and general anesthesia plus epidural block].[全身麻醉与全身麻醉加硬膜外阻滞期间血浆儿茶酚胺变化的比较]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 1991 Apr;13(2):112-4.
2
[The effects of general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia on the stress response in thoracic surgery].[全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉对胸外科手术应激反应的影响]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Mar 10;83(5):408-11.
3
[Modification of oxygen consumption following major abdominal surgery by epidural anesthesia].[硬膜外麻醉对腹部大手术后氧耗的影响]
Anaesthesist. 1993 Sep;42(9):612-8.
4
The effects of epidural anesthesia on the neuroendocrine response to major surgical stress: a randomized prospective trial.硬膜外麻醉对重大手术应激神经内分泌反应的影响:一项随机前瞻性试验。
Am Surg. 1997 Jan;63(1):75-80.
5
Adjuvant bupivacaine scalp block facilitates stabilization of hemodynamics in patients undergoing craniotomy with general anesthesia: a preliminary report.辅助布比卡因头皮阻滞有助于全身麻醉下开颅手术患者血流动力学的稳定:初步报告。
J Clin Anesth. 2006 Nov;18(7):490-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.02.014.
6
Combined general/epidural anesthesia (ropivacaine 0.375%) versus general anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery.全身/硬膜外联合麻醉(0.375%罗哌卡因)与全身麻醉用于上腹部手术的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1562-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1976.
7
[Changes in the concentrations of catecholamines and cortisol in balanced anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia].[平衡麻醉和全静脉麻醉中儿茶酚胺和皮质醇浓度的变化]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1997 Feb;44(2):52-5.
8
[Comparison of lumbar plexus block and epidural block for elderly patients undergoing intertrochanteric femoral fracture surgery].老年股骨粗隆间骨折手术患者腰丛阻滞与硬膜外阻滞的比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Oct 14;88(37):2614-7.
9
Effect of additional general anesthesia with propofol, midazolam or sevoflurane on stress hormone levels in hysterectomy patients, receiving epidural anesthesia.异丙酚、咪达唑仑或七氟醚辅助全身麻醉对接受硬膜外麻醉的子宫切除患者应激激素水平的影响。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1998;49(2):133-9.
10
Vasopressin release following operation upon the vagina performed under general anesthesia or epidural analgesis.在全身麻醉或硬膜外镇痛下进行阴道手术后抗利尿激素的释放。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983 Jun;156(6):781-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.硬膜外或脊髓麻醉降低术后死亡率和发病率:随机试验综述结果
BMJ. 2000 Dec 16;321(7275):1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493.