• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺栓塞排除标准的前瞻性多中心评估。

Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria.

作者信息

Kline J A, Courtney D M, Kabrhel C, Moore C L, Smithline H A, Plewa M C, Richman P B, O'Neil B J, Nordenholz K

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28323-2861, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2008 May;6(5):772-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02944.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02944.x
PMID:18318689
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over-investigation of low-risk patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) represents a growing problem. The combination of gestalt estimate of low suspicion for PE, together with the PE rule-out criteria [PERC(-): age < 50 years, pulse < 100 beats min(-1), SaO(2) >or= 95%, no hemoptysis, no estrogen use, no surgery/trauma requiring hospitalization within 4 weeks, no prior venous thromboembolism (VTE), and no unilateral leg swelling], may reduce speculative testing for PE. We hypothesized that low suspicion and PERC(-) would predict a post-test probability of VTE(+) or death below 2.0%.

METHODS

We enrolled outpatients with suspected PE in 13 emergency departments. Clinicians completed a 72-field, web-based data form at the time of test order. Low suspicion required a gestalt pretest probability estimate of <15%. The main outcome was the composite of image-proven VTE(+) or death from any cause within 45 days.

RESULTS

We enrolled 8138 patients, 85% of whom had a chief complaint of either dyspnea or chest pain. Clinicians reported a low suspicion for PE, together with PERC(-), in 1666 patients (20%). At initial testing and within 45 days, 561 patients (6.9%, 95% confidence interval 6.5-7.6) were VTE(+), and 56 others died. Among the low suspicion and PERC(-) patients, 15 were VTE(+) and one other patient died, yielding a false-negative rate of 16/1666 (1.0%, 0.6-1.6%). As a diagnostic test, low suspicion and PERC(-) had a sensitivity of 97.4% (95.8-98.5%) and a specificity of 21.9% (21.0-22.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gestalt estimate of low suspicion for PE and PERC(-) reduces the probability of VTE to below 2% in about 20% of outpatients with suspected PE.

摘要

背景

对疑似肺栓塞(PE)的低风险患者进行过度检查是一个日益严重的问题。结合对PE低怀疑度的整体评估以及PE排除标准[PERC(-):年龄<50岁、脉搏<100次/分钟、SaO₂≥95%、无咯血、未使用雌激素、4周内无需要住院治疗的手术/外伤、无既往静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)且无单侧下肢肿胀],可能会减少对PE的推测性检查。我们假设低怀疑度和PERC(-)可预测VTE(+)或死亡的检测后概率低于2.0%。

方法

我们在13个急诊科纳入了疑似PE的门诊患者。临床医生在下达检查医嘱时填写一份72项的基于网络的数据表。低怀疑度要求整体预测试概率估计<15%。主要结局是45天内影像学证实的VTE(+)或任何原因导致的死亡。

结果

我们纳入了8138例患者,其中85%的主要诉求为呼吸困难或胸痛。临床医生报告1666例患者(20%)对PE低怀疑度且符合PERC(-)。在初次检查时及45天内,561例患者(6.9%,95%置信区间6.5 - 7.6)为VTE(+),另有56例死亡。在低怀疑度且符合PERC(-)的患者中,15例为VTE(+),1例死亡,假阴性率为16/1666(1.0%,0.6 - 1.6%)。作为一种诊断试验,低怀疑度和PERC(-)的敏感性为97.4%(95.8 - 98.5%),特异性为21.9%(21.0 - 22.9%)。

结论

对PE低怀疑度的整体评估与PERC(-)相结合,可使约20%疑似PE的门诊患者VTE概率降至2%以下。

相似文献

1
Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria.肺栓塞排除标准的前瞻性多中心评估。
J Thromb Haemost. 2008 May;6(5):772-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02944.x. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
2
PERC rule to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency low-risk patients: study protocol for the PROPER randomized controlled study.PERC 规则排除急诊低危患者肺栓塞诊断:PROPER 随机对照研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Nov 25;16:537. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1049-7.
3
Performance of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (the PERC rule) combined with low clinical probability in high prevalence population.在高患病率人群中,肺栓塞排除标准(PERC 规则)联合低临床概率的表现。
Thromb Res. 2012 May;129(5):e189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.016. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
4
Safety of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule: Findings from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbolica venosa (RIETE) registry.肺栓塞排除标准规则的安全性:来自静脉血栓栓塞症登记处(RIETE)的研究结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;30(9):935-945. doi: 10.1111/acem.14744. Epub 2023 May 31.
5
The pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) rule does not safely exclude pulmonary embolism.肺栓塞排除标准(PERC)规则不能安全排除肺栓塞。
J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Feb;9(2):300-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04147.x.
6
Assessment of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.急诊科疑似肺栓塞评估中肺栓塞排除标准规则的评估。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;26(2):181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.026.
7
Pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC) rule in European patients with low implicit clinical probability (PERCEPIC): a multicentre, prospective, observational study.欧洲低隐性临床可能性患者的肺栓塞排除标准(PERC)纳入标准(PERCEPIC):一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。
Lancet Haematol. 2017 Dec;4(12):e615-e621. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30210-7. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
8
Evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule out criteria (PERC rule) in children evaluated for suspected pulmonary embolism.评估疑似肺栓塞患儿的肺栓塞排除标准(PERC 规则)。
Thromb Res. 2018 Aug;168:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Pulmonary Embolism Testing Among Emergency Department Patients Who Are Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria Negative.急诊科中肺栓塞排除标准为阴性的患者的肺栓塞检测
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;24(11):1369-1376. doi: 10.1111/acem.13270. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
Effect of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria on Subsequent Thromboembolic Events Among Low-Risk Emergency Department Patients: The PROPER Randomized Clinical Trial.肺栓塞排除标准对低风险急诊科患者后续血栓栓塞事件的影响:PROPER随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):559-566. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21904.

引用本文的文献

1
Normal Soluble Fibrin Levels Suggest a Low Probability of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis.正常可溶性纤维蛋白水平提示深静脉血栓形成患者发生肺栓塞的可能性较低。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025 Jan-Dec;31:10760296251356209. doi: 10.1177/10760296251356209. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Potential Diagnostic Error for Emergency Conditions, Mortality, and Healthy Days at Home.紧急情况的潜在诊断错误、死亡率及在家健康天数
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516400. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16400.
3
The Potential Effect on the Number of Computerized Tomography Pulmonary Angiography if a Clinical Probability-Adjusted D-dimer Is Added to an Age-Adjusted D-dimer.
如果将临床概率调整后的D-二聚体添加到年龄调整后的D-二聚体中,对计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影数量的潜在影响。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 12;17(3):e80472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80472. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Comparative diagnostic accuracy of pre-test clinical probability scores for the risk stratification of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.疑似肺栓塞患者风险分层的检测前临床概率评分的比较诊断准确性:一项系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03637-6.
5
Redefining chronic mountain sickness: insights from high-altitude research and clinical experience.重新定义慢性高山病:来自高原研究和临床经验的见解
Med Rev (2021). 2024 Aug 27;5(1):44-65. doi: 10.1515/mr-2024-0036. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
National Trends in Pulmonary Embolism Visit in United State Emergency Departments and Associated Costs (2006-2018).美国急诊科肺栓塞就诊情况及相关费用的全国趋势(2006 - 2018年)
Emerg Med Int. 2025 Jan 20;2025:6610196. doi: 10.1155/emmi/6610196. eCollection 2025.
7
Safety and Diagnostic Utility Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) and D-Dimer in Emergency Department.急诊科肺栓塞排除标准(PERC)和D-二聚体的安全性及诊断效用
J Acute Med. 2024 Dec 1;14(4):145-151. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202412_14(4).0002.
8
Machine learning-based prediction of pulmonary embolism to reduce unnecessary computed tomography scans in gastrointestinal cancer patients: a retrospective multicenter study.基于机器学习的肺栓塞预测模型以减少胃肠道癌症患者不必要的 CT 扫描:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 25;14(1):25359. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75977-y.
9
Precision in Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis: Leveraging D-dimer Levels With Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) Insights.肺栓塞诊断的精准性:借助D - 二聚体水平与计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)的见解
Cureus. 2024 Aug 25;16(8):e67765. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67765. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Revision of Clinical Pre-Test Probability Scores in Hospitalized Patients with Pulmonary Embolism and SARS-CoV-2 Infection.住院肺栓塞合并新型冠状病毒肺炎患者临床预测试验概率评分的修订
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 10;24(1):18. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2401018. eCollection 2023 Jan.