Suppr超能文献

循证牙科实践:第三部分。文献的批判性评价、证据的相关性及应用

Evidence-based dental practice: part III. Critical appraisal of the literature, relevance and application of the evidence.

作者信息

Adeyemo W L, Akinwande J A, Bamgbose B O

机构信息

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Lagos.

出版信息

Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2007 Oct-Dec;17(4):165-9. doi: 10.4314/nqjhm.v17i4.12700.

Abstract

Evidence-based dentistry involves defining a question focused on a patient-related problem and searching for reliable evidence to provide an answer. Once potential evidence has been found, it is necessary to determine whether the information is credible and whether it is useful in one's practice by using the technique of critical appraisal. This article discusses the guidelines that have been developed to guide clinicians in assessing the validity and the relevance of published studies (randomized control trials, systematic reviews, cohort studies and case-control studies). The concept and tools of "critical appraisal" of published research works were developed by the evidence-based medicine group at McMaster University, Canada.

摘要

循证牙科包括明确一个聚焦于患者相关问题的疑问,并寻找可靠证据以给出答案。一旦找到潜在证据,就有必要通过批判性评价技术来确定该信息是否可信以及是否对个人的临床实践有用。本文讨论了已制定的指导方针,以引导临床医生评估已发表研究(随机对照试验、系统评价、队列研究和病例对照研究)的有效性和相关性。已发表研究作品的“批判性评价”概念和工具是由加拿大麦克马斯特大学的循证医学小组提出的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验