Souza Givago S, Gomes Bruno D, Lacerda Eliza Maria C B, Saito Cézar A, da Silva Filho Manoel, Silveira Luiz Carlos L
Departamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil.
Vis Neurosci. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):317-25. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080243. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
We investigated how the stimulation mode influences transient visual evoked potentials (tVEP) amplitude as a function of contrast of achromatic and isoluminant chromatic gratings. The chromatic stimulation probed only responses to the red-green axis. Visual stimuli were monocularly presented in a 5 degrees diameter circle, achromatic and chromatic horizontal gratings, 1 Hz pattern reversal stimulation, and achromatic and chromatic gratings, 300 ms onset per 700 ms offset stimulation. For the achromatic pattern reversal stimulation, a double slope function describes how the P100 amplitude varied as a function of log contrast which had a limb at low-to-medium contrasts and another limb at high contrasts. For the achromatic onset/offset stimulation, C2 amplitude saturated at the highest contrast tested and a single straight line described how it changed along most of the contrast range. Both presentation modes for chromatic gratings resulted in amplitude versus log contrast relations which were well described by single straight lines along most of the contrast range. The results may be interpreted as if at 2 cpd, achromatic pattern reversal stimulation evoked the activity of at least two visual pathways with high and low contrast sensitivity, respectively, while achromatic onset/offset stimulation favored the activity of a pathway with high contrast sensitivity. The neural activity in the M pathway is the best candidate to be the high contrast mechanism detected with pattern reversal and pattern onset/offset VEPs. The activity of color opponent pathways such as the P and K pathways either combined or in isolation seems to be responsible for VEPs obtained with isoluminant chromatic gratings at both presentation modes. When the amplitudes of chromatic VEPs were plotted in the same contrast scale as used for achromatic VEPs, chromatic contrast thresholds had similar values to those of the achromatic mechanism with high contrast sensitivity.
我们研究了刺激模式如何影响瞬态视觉诱发电位(tVEP)幅度,该幅度是消色差和等亮度彩色光栅对比度的函数。彩色刺激仅探测对红-绿轴的反应。视觉刺激以单眼方式呈现于直径5度的圆圈中,包括消色差和彩色水平光栅、1赫兹模式反转刺激,以及消色差和彩色光栅,每700毫秒偏移刺激中有300毫秒的起始时间。对于消色差模式反转刺激,双斜率函数描述了P100幅度如何随对数对比度变化,该函数在低至中等对比度时有一个分支,在高对比度时有另一个分支。对于消色差起始/偏移刺激,C2幅度在测试的最高对比度时达到饱和,一条单一的直线描述了它在大部分对比度范围内的变化情况。彩色光栅的两种呈现模式都导致了幅度与对数对比度的关系,在大部分对比度范围内,这些关系都能用单一的直线很好地描述。结果可以解释为,在2周/度时,消色差模式反转刺激分别诱发了至少两条具有高对比度敏感性和低对比度敏感性的视觉通路的活动,而消色差起始/偏移刺激则有利于具有高对比度敏感性的通路的活动。M通路中的神经活动最有可能是通过模式反转和模式起始/偏移视觉诱发电位检测到的高对比度机制。颜色拮抗通路(如P和K通路)的活动,无论是联合还是单独活动,似乎都负责在两种呈现模式下用等亮度彩色光栅获得的视觉诱发电位。当将彩色视觉诱发电位的幅度绘制在与消色差视觉诱发电位相同的对比度尺度上时,彩色对比度阈值与具有高对比度敏感性的消色差机制的阈值相似。