Ekelund U, Forberg J L
Division of Emergency Medicine, Lund University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Postgrad Med J. 2008 Feb;84(988):83-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.048249.
This paper aims to identify and review new and unproven emergency department (ED) methods for improved evaluation in cases of suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Systematic news coverage through PubMed from 2000 to 2006 identified papers on new methods for ED assessment of patients with suspected ACS. Articles found described decision support models, new ECG methods, new biomarkers and point-of-care testing, cardiac imaging, immediate exercise tests and the chest pain unit concept. None of these new methods is likely to be the perfect solution, and the best strategy today is therefore a combination of modern methods, where the optimal protocol depends on local resources and expertise. With a suitable combination of new methods, it is likely that more patients can be managed as outpatients, that length of stay can be shortened for those admitted, and that some patients with ACS can get earlier treatment.
本文旨在识别和综述用于改善疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)病例评估的新型且未经证实的急诊科(ED)方法。通过PubMed对2000年至2006年的系统新闻报道进行检索,确定了有关疑似ACS患者急诊科评估新方法的论文。所发现的文章描述了决策支持模型、新的心电图方法、新的生物标志物和即时检验、心脏成像、即时运动试验以及胸痛单元概念。这些新方法都不太可能是完美的解决方案,因此目前最佳的策略是将现代方法结合起来,其中最佳方案取决于当地资源和专业知识。通过合理组合新方法,有可能使更多患者能够作为门诊患者进行管理,缩短住院患者的住院时间,并使一些ACS患者能够得到更早的治疗。