Peckarsky Barbara L, Kerans Billie L, Taylor Brad W, McIntosh Angus R
Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Oecologia. 2008 May;156(2):431-40. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1004-3.
Animal population dynamics in open systems are affected not only by agents of mortality and the influence of species interactions on behavior and life histories, but also by dispersal and recruitment. We used an extensive data set to compare natural loss rates of two mayfly species that co-occur in high-elevation streams varying in predation risk, and experience different abiotic conditions during larval development. Our goals were to generate hypotheses relating predation to variation in prey population dynamics and to evaluate alternative mechanisms to explain such variation. While neither loss rates nor abundance of the species that develops during snowmelt (Baetis bicaudatus) varied systematically with fish, loss rates of the species that develops during baseflow (Baetis B) were higher in streams containing brook trout than streams without fish; and surprisingly, larvae of this species were most abundant in trout streams. This counter-intuitive pattern could not be explained by a trophic cascade, because densities of intermediate predators (stoneflies) did not differ between fish and fishless streams and predation by trout on stoneflies was negligible. A statistical model estimated that higher recruitment and accelerated development enables Baetis B to maintain larger populations in trout streams despite higher mortality from predation. Experimental estimates suggested that predation by trout potentially accounts for natural losses of Baetis B, but not Baetis bicaudatus. Predation by stoneflies on Baetis is negligible in fish streams, but could make an important contribution to observed losses of both species in fishless streams. Non-predatory sources of loss were higher for B. bicaudatus in trout streams, and for Baetis B in fishless streams. We conclude that predation alone cannot explain variation in population dynamics of either species; and the relative importance of predation is species- and environment-specific compared to non-predatory losses, such as other agents of mortality and non-consumptive effects of predators.
开放系统中的动物种群动态不仅受到死亡因素以及物种间相互作用对行为和生活史的影响,还受到扩散和补充的影响。我们使用了一个广泛的数据集来比较两种同时出现在高海拔溪流中的蜉蝣物种的自然损失率,这些溪流的捕食风险不同,且在幼虫发育期间经历不同的非生物条件。我们的目标是提出关于捕食与猎物种群动态变化之间关系的假设,并评估解释这种变化的替代机制。虽然融雪期发育的物种(双尾蚋)的损失率和丰度都没有随鱼类而系统地变化,但基流期发育的物种(细纹蚋B)在有溪鳟的溪流中的损失率高于无鱼溪流;令人惊讶的是,该物种的幼虫在鳟鱼溪流中最为丰富。这种与直觉相反的模式无法用营养级联来解释,因为中间捕食者(石蝇)的密度在有鱼和无鱼溪流之间没有差异,而且鳟鱼对石蝇的捕食可以忽略不计。一个统计模型估计,更高的补充率和加速发育使细纹蚋B能够在鳟鱼溪流中维持更大的种群数量,尽管因捕食导致的死亡率更高。实验估计表明,鳟鱼的捕食可能是细纹蚋B自然损失的原因,但不是双尾蚋自然损失的原因。在有鱼的溪流中,石蝇对细纹蚋的捕食可以忽略不计,但可能对无鱼溪流中两种物种的观察到的损失有重要贡献。双尾蚋在鳟鱼溪流中的非捕食性损失源更高,而细纹蚋B在无鱼溪流中的非捕食性损失源更高。我们得出结论,仅捕食不能解释任何一个物种的种群动态变化;与非捕食性损失(如其他死亡因素和捕食者的非消费性影响)相比,捕食的相对重要性因物种和环境而异。